From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#15046: 24.3.50; Extra Line under minibuffer in Mac OSX fullscreen Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2013 19:10:27 +0200 Message-ID: <52052283.30404@gmx.at> References: <458E3DA2-8906-443F-9394-7F3E24DDABC5@gmail.com> <83pptnrwnr.fsf@gnu.org> <83mworrokf.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1376068289 25101 80.91.229.3 (9 Aug 2013 17:11:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2013 17:11:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 15046@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 09 19:11:29 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1V7qDp-0004Xc-0Q for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Aug 2013 19:11:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56220 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V7qDo-0006TA-IJ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Aug 2013 13:11:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:32788) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V7qDd-0006Iq-Jl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Aug 2013 13:11:25 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V7qDO-0000eW-P3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Aug 2013 13:11:17 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:55775) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V7qDO-0000eS-M9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Aug 2013 13:11:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1V7qDO-000352-Cs for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Aug 2013 13:11:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2013 17:11:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 15046 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 15046-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B15046.137606824211786 (code B ref 15046); Fri, 09 Aug 2013 17:11:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 15046) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Aug 2013 17:10:42 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50086 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1V7qD2-00033z-Ee for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Aug 2013 13:10:41 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:54670) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1V7qCz-00033P-FT for 15046@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Aug 2013 13:10:38 -0400 Original-Received: from [62.47.50.97] ([62.47.50.97]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 0Me5Q2-1VVaQb1w22-00Py12 for <15046@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 09 Aug 2013 19:10:31 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83mworrokf.fsf@gnu.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:QW3wa94ELRNkgSfUZvpR6iOKZfm6kQxuXSUWYGdUIlDt+hWn1sw k8gA0UmNudPNXAuNTd1gexSIKAN/627ZCqefJEYphLipNQv91lSQ0c6aI6KQ25VPqobEZaY L86Lgfy7dpyMks29PtPI2TcKANZNl4ZRaatIs46tfKsBt/KdsuVY4Liq1eE1FUD9SNoH9CB 3nmeXeHKDVzzyAno+vUcQ== X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:77190 Archived-At: > The minibuffer/echo area window is just another window, so why would > Emacs treat it specially? If other windows can have partially visible > lines, why cannot the minibuffer window have them? We have to handle minibufferless frames anyway. But there's no reason to not optionally give the space to the minibuffer. martin