From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#14886: Fwd: bug#14886: Fwd: A significant slowdown calling font-lock-fontify-buffer from a hook Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 12:20:38 +0200 Message-ID: <51F39EF6.8050408@gmx.at> References: <51E69331.9070007@cs.ucla.edu> <20130724193039.GA11879@acm.acm> <20130726194428.GA3974@acm.acm> <20130727093556.GA3616@acm.acm> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1374920650 28912 80.91.229.3 (27 Jul 2013 10:24:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 10:24:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juanma Barranquero , Paul Eggert , 14886@debbugs.gnu.org To: Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 27 12:24:10 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1V31fV-00054s-Jm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 27 Jul 2013 12:24:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43332 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V31fU-0002MK-Qb for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 27 Jul 2013 06:24:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41793) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V31fN-0002B4-NL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jul 2013 06:24:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V31cU-0006GH-8Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jul 2013 06:21:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:58128) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V31cU-0006GB-3T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jul 2013 06:21:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1V31cT-000372-Na for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jul 2013 06:21:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 10:21:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 14886 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 14886-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B14886.137492045411936 (code B ref 14886); Sat, 27 Jul 2013 10:21:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 14886) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jul 2013 10:20:54 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52444 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1V31cL-00036O-Cb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jul 2013 06:20:53 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:63980) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1V31cI-00035r-CP for 14886@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jul 2013 06:20:51 -0400 Original-Received: from [62.47.51.209] ([62.47.51.209]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 0Lm7MT-1UTPob0O8n-00Zj4B for <14886@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 27 Jul 2013 12:20:44 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20130727093556.GA3616@acm.acm> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:eCtVjFmVX61/UF3US/kRE5Ir60IK5KGwLD0nr7PZl78DIe65rER K5uGRZ9mWEbIn0GU3NiJhPhPRfTLxy5Si2lSFv8oiJzdeeDRxFtXqK2k/r6pK/NXpzf9Efq gi4IeBCNVnwdgEqLGqFojjR7nFdCNVhbhzkfLnawdRv0KH/WTihQVv4Jwg5vatgxpwC+8Oo yBvHE6Q06fjxIG1Id1Tqw== X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:76701 Archived-At: > I've tried a brief ediff between the font-lock files in 24.3 and trunk, > but haven't spotted the difference yet in font-lock-fontify-buffer which > I suspect is there. Why should there be any difference? The value that differs is that of `font-lock-fontify-buffer-function'. Calling `font-lock-fontify-buffer' from prog-mode does `font-lock-default-fontify-buffer'. Calling it from c-mode does `jit-lock-refontify'. Or what am I missing? martin