From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#14829: (no subject) Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 19:37:07 +0200 Message-ID: <51ED6DC3.6040501@gmx.at> References: <20130708170808.555814cb@limelight.wooz.org> <20130711153743.1858db0d@anarchist> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1374514694 9493 80.91.229.3 (22 Jul 2013 17:38:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 17:38:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 14829@debbugs.gnu.org, Barry Warsaw To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 22 19:38:15 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1V1K3p-0002rS-NU for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 19:38:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54989 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V1K3p-0002FP-Bs for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 13:38:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52951) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V1K3j-00029M-Fj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 13:38:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V1K3e-0005Fl-Ae for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 13:38:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:48766) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V1K3e-0005Fh-6z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 13:38:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1V1K3d-0007Jd-QQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 13:38:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 17:38:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 14829 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 14829-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B14829.137451464728054 (code B ref 14829); Mon, 22 Jul 2013 17:38:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 14829) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Jul 2013 17:37:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43082 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1V1K34-0007IQ-CB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 13:37:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:52403) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1V1K30-0007IA-V8 for 14829@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 13:37:24 -0400 Original-Received: from [62.47.48.222] ([62.47.48.222]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 0MFLhE-1UvnkO25Xo-00EOdA for <14829@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 19:37:16 +0200 In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:ui9RlIE1bP5+10DTrOpjl7uyzVmFjH/YuT8WMNHXIfD8seujOFR em27eZVBbwHUVlbJNMym3w7DCDEa6TgqrFPV8bUBktoVHk0/KhImcm5nzHXnssb9nsTu7ml QlhAKJuI/Ru3ayM/baulloZ6YofmUml2L07EZoxBW7Edu16wt7SJA/ZCwzgy2PxgnfTHu8d NZMsOWPSJo1YFtzVryTrw== X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:76573 Archived-At: > Hmm... looking at it further I see that: > - split-window-keep-point defaults to t. > - the problem could affect other cases than completion. > Basically, I'm leaning towards forcing split-window-keep-point to t in > display-buffer, since AFAICT a value of nil only makes sense when you > split a window into two so that they both show the same buffer, whereas > in the case of display-buffer, you always want the current buffer's > point to stay put. With `inhibit-same-window' t one might want to show the same buffer in the new window. > The docstring seems to indicate it's only meant to affect C-x 2 rather > than all cases where we create a new window. Martin? It happens because \\[split-window-below] gets substituted by C-x 2. Why not declare `split-window-keep-point' obsolete and always keep point? martin