From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Drew Adams" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: Darkening font-lock colors Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 17:16:55 -0700 Message-ID: <51DBE55A6F8B433DB2F79A94B3738560@us.oracle.com> References: <87d47hoox5.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87zlahrggt.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> <87tz0pg1uk.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <4A76481C.6000602@harpegolden.net> <87hbwp32ep.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <5908857581A447C3865D9DD2BA70BA16@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1249352323 22389 80.91.229.12 (4 Aug 2009 02:18:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 02:18:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 'David De La Harpe Golden' , 'Chong Yidong' , emacs-devel@gnu.org, 'Juri Linkov' , 'Dan Nicolaescu' , 'Stefan Monnier' , 'Miles Bader' To: "'Lennart Borgman'" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 04 04:18:34 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MY9bk-00060Y-MS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Aug 2009 04:18:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47475 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MY9bk-0003N5-2O for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2009 22:18:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MY7iL-0006Dt-EQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2009 20:17:13 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MY7iG-00069q-HI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2009 20:17:12 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=52064 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MY7iG-00069P-0v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2009 20:17:08 -0400 Original-Received: from rcsinet12.oracle.com ([148.87.113.124]:38101 helo=rgminet12.oracle.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MY7iA-00007E-Tj; Mon, 03 Aug 2009 20:17:03 -0400 Original-Received: from acsinet15.oracle.com (acsinet15.oracle.com [141.146.126.227]) by rgminet12.oracle.com (Switch-3.3.1/Switch-3.3.1) with ESMTP id n740GvWD024676 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 4 Aug 2009 00:16:59 GMT Original-Received: from abhmt010.oracle.com (abhmt010.oracle.com [141.146.116.19]) by acsinet15.oracle.com (Switch-3.3.1/Switch-3.3.1) with ESMTP id n740HJTQ010377; Tue, 4 Aug 2009 00:17:20 GMT Original-Received: from dradamslap1 (/24.5.190.74) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Mon, 03 Aug 2009 17:16:56 -0700 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: Thread-Index: AcoUmByL/IXzWBzURwKvVreMLPHlPgAAF+CA X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 X-Source-IP: abhmt010.oracle.com [141.146.116.19] X-Auth-Type: Internal IP X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A010204.4A777DFA.0044:SCFSTAT5015188,ss=1,fgs=0 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:113645 Archived-At: > I have not talked about trading off. I have said the reverse that we > do not have to do that. We can meet the requirement for accessibility > (as specified by WCAG) and still have room for usability changes. OK, good. > Yes, but if you tell me more I can maybe suggest something better. Same thing you said: maybe it's too much. I don't have more to say about it. > It sounds like it looks very different on your display. Could you > perhaps show an image? No, it's the same. Nevermind about it. Just record one opinion not in favor. See what others think. As I said already, I don't really care what the default faces are. Just let users know what they were before, in case they liked one of the old colors and want to customize to it.