From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Small improvements to ruby-mode Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2013 13:37:06 +0400 Message-ID: <51D7E542.2050601@yandex.ru> References: <2A6700DEDCA640EF92B326002717596D@gmail.com> <87txkrm46t.fsf@yandex.ru> <6EF2AEF8D67840A2AF1C908AA3D0725F@gmail.com> <51C5A67A.2020002@yandex.ru> <51C6EA5F.2040408@yandex.ru> <51D1CB5A.2060900@yandex.ru> <51D1F98D.3060900@yandex.ru> <51D31E12.7060002@yandex.ru> <51D4476A.40107@yandex.ru> <51D6A02C.2020207@yandex.ru> <51D6D500.7080306@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1373103437 13738 80.91.229.3 (6 Jul 2013 09:37:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2013 09:37:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel To: Bozhidar Batsov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 06 11:37:18 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UvOvd-00056c-Tq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 06 Jul 2013 11:37:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36082 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UvOvd-0005PC-GF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 06 Jul 2013 05:37:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52948) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UvOvX-0005OE-Sf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jul 2013 05:37:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UvOvU-000802-7e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jul 2013 05:37:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lb0-x230.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c04::230]:39395) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UvOvT-0007zx-QT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jul 2013 05:37:08 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-lb0-f176.google.com with SMTP id z5so2591891lbh.35 for ; Sat, 06 Jul 2013 02:37:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :x-antivirus:x-antivirus-status; bh=lfREEr5jUL13eZxqmtjF+Vt5oBMk4IhZ+uwraqFUSe8=; b=omDDhoh6l7H/CDGifPpR/FiYhjqDem6ug8SWa+spSBN3otQrMYiap3PpbnoIO+sJka CYCD/xumS9XoR89U+bVqzqKHG1MksD2LgoYrPNVZTT6irAOJuFZ56SAJTDYFW5SgfcaW RrRrmYdFh/yr/hTXT9Z0d2qlXNqmszg6w+zwzVH7HKZwbPEe12yhZB+2e0IbFxVI30Vo JakTbhdC0c3Gpi7U+EpQ91A/UV1VwpV7dK8ItYsdjjpXxDRjG2VXW/PZYkvQCWJZZh7f 5lMnv2loWdJhN09nHSAerlWRq5CwhcvuweqqJKUr44CJD7KvFSBpE2k79cinf3wbFxgH Hv3g== X-Received: by 10.152.115.194 with SMTP id jq2mr6543359lab.53.1373103426815; Sat, 06 Jul 2013 02:37:06 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([178.252.98.87]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id m1sm4180822lag.3.2013.07.06.02.37.05 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 06 Jul 2013 02:37:05 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130705-1, 05.07.2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c04::230 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:161640 Archived-At: On 06.07.2013 9:31, Bozhidar Batsov wrote: > We should contact Kyle, then, for the copyright assignment. Or, > again, patches welcome. :) > > > I guess it'd be best of Stefan approached him? Not necessarily. IME, the hard part is to get the author to agree to this commitment. > A bold yellowish face seems like a nice option to me. Will make it clear > that !orax is not actually lorax for instance. Maybe it should simply > derive from the keyword face? I don't think it should: in the default theme, purple negation char would look odd. > On a related note - often && and || are > highlighted as keywords. Maybe ruby-mode should do the same for > consistency with `and` and `or`? I don't think I've ever seen that (e.g. python-mode and coffee-mode don't). These are not particularly different from other operators, and I don't think we should highlight them all.