From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: How to restore the layout? Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 19:05:02 +0200 Message-ID: <51C87C3E.90904@gmx.at> References: <51C5AA68.4000204@alice.it> <51C6B138.50903@gmx.at> <51C6CF57.9030203@alice.it> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1372093527 20058 80.91.229.3 (24 Jun 2013 17:05:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 17:05:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs To: Angelo Graziosi Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 24 19:05:27 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UrACg-0003hz-AY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 19:05:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40825 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UrACf-0006AM-Sk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 13:05:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47949) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UrACc-000684-Ct for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 13:05:19 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UrACY-0006xw-Vh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 13:05:18 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:64348) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UrACY-0006x2-NK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 13:05:14 -0400 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([10.1.76.29]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmx001) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0M8LTo-1U5N2b0L22-00w1H0 for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 19:05:11 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 24 Jun 2013 17:05:10 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-51-28.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.51.28]) [62.47.51.28] by mail.gmx.net (mp029) with SMTP; 24 Jun 2013 19:05:10 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX181l+hFXW01Y11tOFSlETBhkWfH6x04FPqpOv416p GSMPpfLpr+UWzy In-Reply-To: <51C6CF57.9030203@alice.it> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:160952 Archived-At: > If I understand, at the moment, with those (working) functions, one > should each time "save" and "restore" manually the *desktop*, instead > adding the missing part, all this is done when the desktop-saving is > enabled... I vote for the last solution. Working with emacs would be > more comfortable.. When I wrote these functions I was told that writing the desktop front end would be easy. ISTR that someone started to write it but haven't heard anything lately. Maybe you could give it a try? martin