From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#14666: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:44:16 +0200 Message-ID: <51C1EDF0.40700@gmx.at> References: <015b7f9e-f365-4c91-bdf7-2fc8f08b256a@default> <83sj0eozd9.fsf@gnu.org> <83ppvioxno.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1371663910 9266 80.91.229.3 (19 Jun 2013 17:45:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 17:45:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 14666@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 19 19:45:09 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UpMRQ-0007qS-D0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:45:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39195 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UpMRP-00047G-R8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:45:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43641) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UpMRM-00046G-Tf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:45:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UpMRL-0004wZ-1U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:45:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:33615) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UpMRK-0004w4-UV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:45:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UpMRK-00084p-6C for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:45:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 17:45:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 14666 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 14666-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B14666.137166387730973 (code B ref 14666); Wed, 19 Jun 2013 17:45:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 14666) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Jun 2013 17:44:37 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56163 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UpMQu-00083S-Cm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:44:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:59321) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UpMQs-00083D-Dt for 14666@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:44:35 -0400 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([10.1.76.29]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmx002) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0Lur0x-1U6qVu43az-0107q6 for <14666@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:44:28 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 19 Jun 2013 17:44:27 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-44-31.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.44.31]) [62.47.44.31] by mail.gmx.net (mp029) with SMTP; 19 Jun 2013 19:44:27 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX190l2ETVr50k4petlMRA51HTig7qjpeC1Ztizomcc xM+W698vFMY5JU In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:75357 Archived-At: >> The only explanation is that another thread modified w->contents after >> it was tested with BUFFERP. > > Should that be possible? Not really. w->contents can be only set to another buffer which would still pass the assertion. Hence any such "modification" would mean that the window got collected in between the two checks. martin