From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#14631: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 09:20:41 +0200 Message-ID: <51C00A49.80200@gmx.at> References: <83wqpssnme.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1371540079 18208 80.91.229.3 (18 Jun 2013 07:21:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 07:21:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 14631@debbugs.gnu.org, Juanma Barranquero To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 18 09:21:18 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UoqE8-0002wr-PA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 09:21:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46508 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UoqE8-0003nJ-BJ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 03:21:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49386) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UoqDy-0003Zc-54 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 03:21:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UoqDv-0001am-OI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 03:21:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:57875) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UoqDv-0001ac-KL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 03:21:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UoqDv-0005GX-7G for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 03:21:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 07:21:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 14631 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 14631-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B14631.137154006020216 (code B ref 14631); Tue, 18 Jun 2013 07:21:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 14631) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jun 2013 07:21:00 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52190 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UoqDq-0005Fx-QA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 03:20:59 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:63249) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UoqDo-0005FT-3k for 14631@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 03:20:56 -0400 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([10.1.76.29]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmx002) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0LfUwx-1UVV2h1LA1-00p3RZ for <14631@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 09:20:50 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 18 Jun 2013 07:20:50 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-59-141.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.59.141]) [62.47.59.141] by mail.gmx.net (mp029) with SMTP; 18 Jun 2013 09:20:50 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19p5VZ12atphUBjQ4hJrc3feAc2XG7boJxmv77My6 TzoD8Fc9q46CQ3 In-Reply-To: <83wqpssnme.fsf@gnu.org> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:75281 Archived-At: > This is because we somehow call unblock_input more than we call > block_input. Do we have any facilities to find out where this > happens? Stefan? anyone? Add parameters to block_input and unblock_input to remember where they were called from. I think that such an investment should pay off in the long run. martin