From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: trunk r112980: * lisp/emacs-lisp/package.el: Don't recompute dir. Use pkg-descs more. Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 21:42:27 +0400 Message-ID: <51BF4A83.40903@yandex.ru> References: <87obb6t25l.fsf@yandex.ru> <51BEAC20.6050309@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1371490965 22897 80.91.229.3 (17 Jun 2013 17:42:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 17:42:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 17 19:42:45 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UodRx-0002Fg-RK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 19:42:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49113 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UodRx-000633-DU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 13:42:41 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45952) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UodRr-00062w-3G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 13:42:39 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UodRn-0002hM-Dw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 13:42:35 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lb0-f171.google.com ([209.85.217.171]:36412) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UodRn-0002hE-6c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 13:42:31 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-lb0-f171.google.com with SMTP id 13so2765913lba.2 for ; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 10:42:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :x-antivirus:x-antivirus-status; bh=vdFE0EK98zS6UNEMTp5BbrurJJMn0wylJCHMcjMkdyY=; b=fENXK3g4lSj4hfZZRlVA3C4yrB1djhAyf0D01worj6+YgaZzIYUYvxLbpio4b5WiwJ hD25BPoFegjzVy235hoSEPhcshrLZ//f83jze4JyEqxPCBGlwdi9BQBujkgB7wshjTbh VzjwatwPbZCBISRE6wrmwaPzGIAZJSMcs6fHUYGOTiIUxSQuHWGZmdEa5/9TXpERBNUK pKSlxjgKIRzqkTWMiUh2Kcz78M8zmOBOdMSXtUEbzMcxcKZo6v9arUGecAQUsDXvdcmw Zl5eqNH3rLzgSiUjuDTD0s97NXRmw7+2lXI1UiH2MENMSr1MfnX1Dtpeg4Ev57D3cVRU MH4g== X-Received: by 10.152.8.103 with SMTP id q7mr7303191laa.64.1371490949962; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 10:42:29 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([178.252.98.87]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id uo8sm5809045lbb.5.2013.06.17.10.42.27 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 17 Jun 2013 10:42:28 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6 In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130617-1, 17.06.2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.85.217.171 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:160513 Archived-At: On 17.06.2013 18:32, Stefan Monnier wrote: >>>> Is using emacs-lisp-mode here necessary? >>> No. Can you make it a bug-report, please (or install a patch which >>> just makes it use the emacs-lisp-mode syntax-table, since that's all >>> that matters)? >> Sure, installed. > > Actually, that was silly: since the code just uses `read' it doesn't > even need the syntax table (all this is because of some earlier code > I used which did need the syntax-table, and I didn't update my brain > according to the new code). That makes sense. Initially, I just commented emacs-lisp-mode call out, and the function worked fine, but I figured there could be some edge cases, etc.