From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Andreas_R=F6hler?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: at risk Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 13:54:39 +0200 Message-ID: <51BC55FF.1030506@online.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1371297237 13145 80.91.229.3 (15 Jun 2013 11:53:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 11:53:57 +0000 (UTC) To: Emacs developers Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 15 13:53:57 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Unp3M-0005Rw-AT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 13:53:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44753 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Unp3L-0004v1-S5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 07:53:55 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56941) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Unp3J-0004us-77 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 07:53:53 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Unp3I-00006Z-4Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 07:53:53 -0400 Original-Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.171]:50785) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Unp3H-00005I-S0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 07:53:52 -0400 Original-Received: from purzel.sitgens (brln-4db9f840.pool.mediaWays.net [77.185.248.64]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mreu4) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MOHTM-1UiIkD0tTo-006D4s; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 13:53:49 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130510 Thunderbird/17.0.6 X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:2uFLAsyMWsZ7SasJlCQ09CTmGT7walAwuqTXj/10PSI o1kIMDcQlE0e/YDDXVEE6jb1a7jqoPpiGSGLJ7T/TzCDDZ3kQv lQ0Sq9Olk07eg2Ln2O3U38zHa9W5hHB6DzR4QCn82KnHgqzeU3 3f6ZT23SoFV/hc9S+tXpmihpgmgMKtmZSXo8vdNOT2B70FrnxF 6RCpYcLzEkt8Uxh/jblBTzT9bu5/RJuFAYrwO2v8/sQqPDAuzf +BQ1FTcE8WQhVXDFfb60qBIXcrRmD2d3DvkJFyU1aYNb0cA/8S vIYCLtPy86BVWPGVaSP35evuSRSShc+hY9/Ml88BUWmBJg8Jwi j5xDmWKjPRsBxdp3JWhM= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.126.171 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:160447 Archived-At: When execution might rely on variables set by user, resp. at a later time, such a function should preferably not be used by programs, i.e. in circumstances being with some probability not aware of the changed proceeding. This is the case for example with `forward-sexp', which might be taken by `forward-sexp-function'. Please consider bug#14611. Being concerned a certain amount of code is set already at risk that way. Thanks, Andreas