From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miguel Guedes Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Apply faces to string output to mini-buffer Date: 24 May 2013 05:27:15 GMT Message-ID: <519efa33$0$32272$862e30e2@ngroups.net> References: <519df490$0$33340$862e30e2@ngroups.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1369377311 18633 80.91.229.3 (24 May 2013 06:35:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 06:35:11 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 24 08:35:12 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Uflal-0001rA-UQ for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 24 May 2013 08:35:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46502 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uflal-0005yk-DR for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 24 May 2013 02:35:07 -0400 Original-Path: usenet.stanford.edu!news.glorb.com!transit3.readnews.com!news-out.readnews.com!s09-01.readnews.com!not-for-mail Original-X-Trace: DXC=LDebd7l28JgZ0; dZM2f List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:91013 Archived-At: On Thu, 23 May 2013 19:26:09 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Use 'propertize'. I did do, Eli, and while it works as expected with normal buffers it doesn't so when it comes to the minibuffer. Your answer, though, has forced me to consider the approach I've been taking, which was to use the built in C function `message' to output propertized strings? Your reply seems to imply my approach is wrong and I should instead look for a different one - perhaps I shouldn't be using `message' at all? -- Miguel