From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: A Soare Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: [alinsoar@voila.fr: EVAL and mouse selection in *Completions*] Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 09:28:03 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5188384.275161173342483586.JavaMail.www@wwinf4205> Reply-To: alinsoar@voila.fr NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1173342518 14830 80.91.229.12 (8 Mar 2007 08:28:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 08:28:38 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 08 09:28:32 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HPDzD-0005jM-GL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2007 09:28:31 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HPDzO-00066J-JH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2007 03:28:42 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HPDz3-00064i-99 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2007 03:28:21 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HPDyz-00062E-OP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2007 03:28:18 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HPDyz-000624-Ac for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2007 03:28:17 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp3.voila.fr ([193.252.22.173]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HPDyn-0005IE-30 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2007 03:28:05 -0500 Original-Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf4201.voila.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 9EA611C00113 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 09:28:03 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from wwinf4205 (wwinf4205 [10.232.2.32]) by mwinf4201.voila.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 92EF11C00086 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 09:28:03 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20070308082803601.92EF11C00086@mwinf4201.voila.fr X-Originating-IP: [89.34.170.37] X-Wum-Nature: EMAIL-NATURE X-WUM-FROM: |~| X-WUM-TO: |~| X-WUM-REPLYTO: |~| X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:67564 Archived-At: > Why do you forward bug reports from emacs-devel to emacs-devel, with > only the little "please DTRT and ACK" addition? > > Because my experience is that this gets someone to debug and fix it. > If I don't do this, quite often nobody works on the bug. > > It also gives me a reminder if nobody works on it. If the OP see in 1-2 months that it is not solved yet, the OP will report it again. > > It has the effect of > removing the OP from the CC list when people reply to your forward, as > well as creating a separate thread. > > Perhaps I should reply instead. Since the OP reported it as a bug, not as a patch, that means that the OP does not necessarily want to work on this bug. So it is not very important to reply to the OP every time, just in case of misunderstandings... I spoke just from the viewpoint of my bugs. For the others members that report bugs, maybe the opinions differ. A Soare