From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#53636: 29.0.50; face-remapping broken on master Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 19:24:19 +0100 Message-ID: <517f576b-6a6b-3e1e-b899-b67bcf9ad512@gmx.at> References: <87o83tib13.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtjd8485.fsf@gnus.org> <83a6fd9glm.fsf@gnu.org> <835yq19dk1.fsf@gnu.org> <87czk97yt6.fsf@gnus.org> <8335l49jwu.fsf@gnu.org> <835ypz8zbm.fsf@gnu.org> <87fsp2v0ky.fsf@gnus.org> <83leyu73i8.fsf@gnu.org> <87k0edrvxm.fsf@gnus.org> <83sft15egx.fsf@gnu.org> <871r0loxr9.fsf@gnus.org> <83mtj85tm1.fsf@gnu.org> <87wnibn48c.fsf@gnus.org> <8335kz4tgu.fsf@gnu.org> <87ee4hg7g6.fsf@gnus.org> <83y22p21na.fsf@gnu.org> <871r0haqzr.fsf@gnus.org> <8335kw1n9u.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtj34mdj.fsf@gnus.org> <837da6yb0j.fsf@gnu.org> <87k0e5vqjm.fsf@gnus.org> <916b44c9-56dc-65b9-8894-cb5954e1bd9c@gmx.at> <83leylwmwo.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="1625"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 53636@debbugs.gnu.org, tsdh@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 08 19:49:07 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nHVY3-0000FM-FA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 19:49:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56248 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nHVY1-0005TR-Cc for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 13:49:05 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43420) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nHVAl-0007Kh-1p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 13:25:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54718) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nHVAk-0006C7-KY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 13:25:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHVAk-0005bj-I4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 13:25:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2022 18:25:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 53636 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: confirmed Original-Received: via spool by 53636-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B53636.164434466921508 (code B ref 53636); Tue, 08 Feb 2022 18:25:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 53636) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Feb 2022 18:24:29 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48615 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHVAD-0005aq-Ff for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 13:24:29 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:59071) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHVAB-0005aY-Gn for 53636@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 13:24:27 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1644344662; bh=7Vpfpv7R33veUKIGboK1tL2/qQ0oKeotv5AltV67XFs=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=Gdkq2T+spgR2uS3/mlS7WR9Jx0gqwAORTBVDZY63/m6jW1zidEP6ZHb4/UZbPDDX3 BwMz096K9QURFXJ1Cct3LDEEdhis3ApaOG1J1lJhyOBTe3qakoZ2xtNoqZQ6L+JvlW 5K/R67BqmpQQ7R5b/deMoWID1c6JkQwA/1KZTU98= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from [192.168.1.102] ([212.95.5.151]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx104 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1M7b6b-1nPSi828bN-0085K2; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 19:24:21 +0100 Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <83leylwmwo.fsf@gnu.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:VUgONNcWsCjhTaITyhcej1Z7ZOTwtcBHtUZO4jkxLWquDQT2vGn Yqp1HcjWICLZmb7ojhsAk1gFtuKd2SBlaHGOjX9nFL07Byw+C1t2AAw0NOWMuciAJjM/4N0 7Oilg/md19efTspjE2fr2DluY1Pyt9NMHZj6BT/vgbdUkPKa6oLaq856ZAY2ltMfhRK+Vov +OOIU2zOlysQzfo0s6LJw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:u3dN/sj/AcM=:qoMiJv3LWOHumznJxr0LOO bn5jhqm9IzFZOZYC5ccNvkKIE640lqImBwyHXrffzPSkyKmU0E5M6RPkONBEcPoHbDqHR/ZVt hAfgLkN8fXEZY6vLWWkDDQtjLAaRZQxnIgtLjwwgHckBXz6icDghY5NbcteudMAG04AdQAAqX RxxvMfTH5xzzsJ1psP8UyT0mu68Iq1H1yHlu/96IrlN10NCWaDUD0viAYANP5EPeui1YsS68b zPmPIoTpubadCzd8A+Z0ZOjzt8nMUnN3i3WhBEDgPBH3SKoqDtfslbQKIHN0c+OtX7Zkc3B2e wtzIslHptdxeOm2BF1wcxLd4RyR3NbeDiKtYxdmxzELGAMVTpDBJBz78a9Ac2OeXjHsIiUcEM 5qDkS8Ok8WofRhXPOiK+6z0AZwQPkzUdx+662BPcasXzs8xe8bowrIubynwN/xQSYbBapSn6v r5BScB12wfNFSENmMP3i6SlxqFI31UTJwnxveIWlbb3A/wY+Cm6vMItpygX66ayKt5i2z1Njy mX9UwVngb0Y2inu33vO5j9AWeWmrroigUiBE2Vb60+fv8lPAUFPS8F3iOfk+WEV6BNrnYSBsS 9W/wO0/ZmBlKbrfXid9lqs0GesAgIZlQtkr/IDdoxqSM8u6pb9Hir6AIpN+//ac4amL0d/yjN +dH/++tIPGdP0YEFamCx4BBjlJ5RNiOq7p4ob4VwD5wp8WexNxC0uj+GZ6vAW/MnIdlVMm9PR +IuSFHY/ODw5F3+RrIOkWCUOquH3zuuL1vNt+9JG2Ah3Rxs4kgDS2WTHxuzM3RfEwdASKnSt X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:226398 Archived-At: >> Face remapping has never been properly synchronized with windows and >> frames. What's needed is a simple hierarchy window > window's buffer > >> window's frame where the first should be implemented with the help of a >> 'face-remapping' window parameter and the last with the help of a >> 'face-remapping' frame parameter. Just like we (should) do for things >> like the scroll bars or fringes. But we need a consensus on this first. > > I don't think I understand this remark. While what you describe might > be a useful addition, I don't see why we must have it, or else. > Surely, Emacs has gobs of features that depend only on the buffer, but > not on the window nor the frame where that buffer is displayed? Why > cannot we have a reasonable behavior with face-remapping-alist being > specific to a buffer, no matter in what window we display it? What makes you think that this is not part of my proposal? What I mean is to have a clear rule how, for example, a buffer local setting of 'face-remapping-alist' may affect the creation of a new frame and the display of buffers in it. martin