bug#14165: 24.3; Man page update against help

bug#14165: 24.3; Man page update against help

[Petr Hracek]

Hi,

I have compared help against man page
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948838)

Patch for 24.3 is here:
diff --git a/doc/man/emacs.1 b/doc/man/emacs.1
index 4f7f8d2..50d8038 100644
--- a/doc/man/emacs.1
+++ b/doc/man/emacs.1
@@ -61,6 +61,9 @@ The following options are of general interest:
  Edit
  .IR file .
  .TP
+.BI \-\-chdir " directory\fR\fP "
+Change to directory
+.TP
  .BI \-\-file " file\fR,\fP " \-\-find-file " file\fR,\fP " \-\-visit " 
file"
  The same as specifying
  .I file
@@ -82,9 +85,15 @@ and
  .BR \-q ", " \-\-no\-init\-file
  Do not load an init file.
  .TP
+.BR \-nl ", " \-\-no\-shared\-memory
+Do not use shared memory
+.TP
  .B \-\-no\-site\-file
  Do not load the site-wide startup file.
  .TP
+.BR \-nsl ", " \-\-no\-site\-list
+Do not add site-lisp directories to load-path
+.TP
  .B \-\-no\-desktop
  Do not load a saved desktop.
  .TP
@@ -325,6 +334,9 @@ in iconified state.
  .BR \-nbc ", " \-\-no\-blinking\-cursor
  Disable blinking cursor.
  .TP
+.BR \-\-parent-id " xid\fR\fP "
+Set parent window
+.TP
  .BR \-nw ", " \-\-no\-window\-system
  Tell
  .I Emacs

Could it be acceptable?

By the way emacs-nox has no man page and I think it would be good to 
create either link or copy of emacs.1.gz to emacs-nox.1.gz

What do you think about that?

-- 
S pozdravem / Best regards

Petr Hracek

bug#14165: 24.3; Man page update against help

[Glenn Morris]

Petr Hracek wrote:

> I have compared help against man page
> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948838)

"You are not authorized to access bug #948838."

(Sadly it feels like this is increasingly common with Red Hat bugs.
Hard to imagine what sensitive customer data can possibly be in that report.)

> Patch for 24.3 is here:

Thanks, applied to emacs-24 branch, with minor tweaks.

> By the way emacs-nox has no man page and I think it would be good to
> create either link or copy of emacs.1.gz to emacs-nox.1.gz

Up to you. Personally I think "man emacs" is still fine, even if the
package is called "emacs-nox" or "emacs-24" or whatever.