From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Davis Herring Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: superword-mode Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 14:16:26 -0600 Organization: XCP-1 Message-ID: <5155F69A.5060700@lanl.gov> References: <87wqt0xqiy.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87sj3ny4ca.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87ehf7zid3.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <87obeby2ph.fsf@lifelogs.com> <878v5fxzjg.fsf@lifelogs.com> <871ub7xn7e.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87r4j2v7t8.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87zjxqt21y.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com> <87zjxnqgec.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87txnuqqvb.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1364588202 20313 80.91.229.3 (29 Mar 2013 20:16:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 20:16:42 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 29 21:17:09 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ULfjR-0001It-Ej for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 21:17:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44758 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ULfj3-00084s-39 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 16:16:37 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:51696) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ULfiy-00083E-QA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 16:16:33 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ULfiv-0000n4-7b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 16:16:32 -0400 Original-Received: from proofpoint4.lanl.gov ([204.121.3.52]:40262) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ULfiu-0000mk-TS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 16:16:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mailrelay2.lanl.gov (mailrelay2.lanl.gov [128.165.4.103]) by proofpoint4.lanl.gov (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r2TKGQ3Z026835 for ; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 14:16:26 -0600 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mailrelay2.lanl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBBE6A22F7A for ; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 14:16:26 -0600 (MDT) X-NIE-2-Virus-Scanner: amavisd-new at mailrelay2.lanl.gov Original-Received: from [128.165.123.183] (xray-r06.lanl.gov [128.165.123.183]) by mailrelay2.lanl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB223A22F75 for ; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 14:16:26 -0600 (MDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110717 Lanikai/3.1.11 In-Reply-To: <87txnuqqvb.fsf@lifelogs.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.10.8626, 1.0.431, 0.0.0000 definitions=2013-03-29_08:2013-03-29, 2013-03-29, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x X-Received-From: 204.121.3.52 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:158442 Archived-At: > TZ> 1) use `forward-sexp' instead of `forward-symbol' > TZ> 2) implement a local version of `forward-symbol' > TZ> 3) autoload `forward-symbol' > > In order to avoid breakage I implemented (1) but please tell me if you > think that's the wrong decision. Thanks. I think it's certainly wrong to do (1) -- a balanced set of parentheses or so is not a natural extension of a word the way a symbol is, and it seems useful for M-f and C-M-f to remain distinct under `superword-mode'. I don't have a preference between (2) and (3), except to say that either the (2) version or the thingatpt version could be (re)written to use \_< and \_> just like `cfengine-mode'. Davis -- This product is sold by volume, not by mass. If it appears too dense or too sparse, it is because mass-energy conversion has occurred during shipping.