From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: GNU ELPA Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2013 01:18:12 +0400 Message-ID: <514E1C14.9090000@gmail.com> References: <87ehfalotd.fsf@yandex.ru> <87li9eqdoe.fsf@yandex.ru> <514E162B.8000508@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1364096299 13118 80.91.229.3 (24 Mar 2013 03:38:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2013 03:38:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 24 04:38:45 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UJbld-0006ud-8T for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 04:38:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53663 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UJblF-0001Pa-N6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 23:38:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38629) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UJVpQ-0005VO-TK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 17:18:19 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UJVpO-00059c-A2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 17:18:16 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-la0-x22c.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c03::22c]:65428) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UJVpO-00059M-1c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 17:18:14 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-la0-f44.google.com with SMTP id eb20so9312047lab.3 for ; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 14:18:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-antivirus:x-antivirus-status; bh=D5O57rOEOi9WRdI4bJKyVo+iwJhKSafwIuWX7BQV+l8=; b=eTtjMJ1rOjegWXzLS4+G18xyq0essS24GQXBl8bWkUa6V9t6Rn4lzsfwKpn7RMj8CF LxmT1UQeuXuX6kPCrBL/rFxFIPnN2/Quz7fF1e8IV0J2AHsCrKH71Jg7ZXLYoWY2L9o0 ORPlkaeUIODyU4sbyqI3QOTKudbrptfNkcgFUPSPJOBsQIFvo3TcM0f7ju9mEQlhEW+6 OnwG+HA8A+wqpqeYdio3UPUI0JqMdc+nxPMb192FzpwnwCRBMfZmD1AWotPKbvAh/5Jn 89boPCSpuc9MlyawC8zYQUMvGx/cF4uOuIhI3LHU06FgGm0RYwXnKZnceIv558oz9WHW SxHw== X-Received: by 10.152.87.243 with SMTP id bb19mr1470281lab.12.1364073493022; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 14:18:13 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([178.252.98.87]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id nv3sm655316lbb.15.2013.03.23.14.18.10 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 23 Mar 2013 14:18:11 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4 In-Reply-To: <514E162B.8000508@yandex.ru> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130323-1, 23.03.2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c03::22c X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 23 Mar 2013 23:38:19 -0400 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:158099 Archived-At: On 24.03.2013 0:52, Dmitry Gutov wrote: > On 23.03.2013 23:44, Stefan Monnier wrote: >>> Should I remove the file, the variable from it, or can we add an >>> exception to not add .dir-locals.el to packages? >> >> It doesn't seem to warrant such measures. >> After all, the user can just say "accept and consider this value as safe >> from now on". > > I have a report that the prompt appears during the installation, in some > circumstances: https://github.com/company-mode/company-mode/issues/4 > > Probably an issue with some third-party package, but if Steve Purcell > has it, then any of the hundreds of people who base their Emacs > configuration off of his are likely to encounter it, too. Okay, that was a local problem and it had been fixed. Sorry for the noise.