From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: company.el status? Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2013 14:05:01 +0400 Message-ID: <513B094D.5040204@yandex.ru> References: <87ip53yuuv.fsf@yandex.ru> <5138DC2E.3020102@nschum.de> <87k3pj7xfy.fsf@yandex.ru> <5139C8E0.3030503@nschum.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1362823520 28958 80.91.229.3 (9 Mar 2013 10:05:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2013 10:05:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org, Nikolaj Schumacher To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 09 11:05:45 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UEGeu-0000Wj-14 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Mar 2013 11:05:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60164 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UEGeY-00058J-1a for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Mar 2013 05:05:22 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47830) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UEGeN-00055x-HH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Mar 2013 05:05:20 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UEGeF-0008FX-38 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Mar 2013 05:05:11 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-lb0-f172.google.com ([209.85.217.172]:61024) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UEGeE-0008B9-Rp; Sat, 09 Mar 2013 05:05:03 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-lb0-f172.google.com with SMTP id n8so1970788lbj.31 for ; Sat, 09 Mar 2013 02:05:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-antivirus:x-antivirus-status; bh=an9yNNb3UXApBT7mvsEPKS5aqQS3LWh7qILV5wOQ1Tg=; b=urK7+W+og2be8FkpoV0WVAipNV8DtUz0ktwjuZsSGifjBAd0TGLTXXluIl1u02yuVs FqHnBAHZarHGti01DnXBrWb9U4whB04ISauiOEdkXVZ0xk1haml4fNhtcrgYgOcCi9eg 7/vP30kBhXlMfoaBeDc8e+FLvnbGKU9JKWixpIH9XfVeggh8K6b1fbOm3Iq815nSHO+U 5FvNZddDl5JMNK0lJyT3a1i+DCFTQn3C8R8cnDkgnSS/HJnGyivjY+xzyB1GeUYfq4as pSsnrQhRrnV5SxQWhyHr4LtTGzIEf5RjjsDuQ9cLnf/sjb70VLJDWNRL2ovHsJgxMxBw zoxg== X-Received: by 10.152.105.17 with SMTP id gi17mr4563986lab.46.1362823501505; Sat, 09 Mar 2013 02:05:01 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([178.252.98.87]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e11sm2464885lbd.11.2013.03.09.02.04.59 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 09 Mar 2013 02:05:00 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130215 Thunderbird/17.0.3 In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130308-1, 09.03.2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.85.217.172 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:157651 Archived-At: On 09.03.2013 7:11, Stefan Monnier wrote: >>> Since you replied now, could you update the homepage? >> I think it would be good to create a Github project/readme page and redirect >> to that. > > Much better would be to use the ELPA branch as the official upstream. Leaving aside other details, I'd be more comfortable using ELPA for development if it were using Git (this is coming, I hear), and if it didn't lump all packages together in one repository. The current situation only seems useful when someone is making sweeping changes across packages, like updating copyright dates. This action seems to be relatively rare, and could be automated either way. On 09.03.2013 12:19, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Why do we need Github? The decision is up to Nikolaj, but for one thing, I expect strong correlation between people who prefer using completion mechanism with graphical interface and ones who would prefer a bug tracker with an actual user interface versus email-driven austerity that is Debbugs.