From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jens Schmidt Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Keep network security info buffers after use Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2023 22:34:22 +0100 Message-ID: <512a0684-f69c-4c7d-802f-274d4769426e@vodafonemail.de> References: <87plz4irev.fsf@red-bean.com> <87sf3ywxak.fsf@red-bean.com> <83h6keicdy.fsf@gnu.org> <87a5q6rpfj.fsf@red-bean.com> <83wmtaggdq.fsf@gnu.org> <87o7emosib.fsf@red-bean.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="3133"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Karl Fogel , Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 20 22:35:59 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rG4EQ-0000TP-6S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 22:35:58 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rG4DT-0006ey-0D; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 16:34:59 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rG4DR-0006em-51 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 16:34:57 -0500 Original-Received: from mr5.vodafonemail.de ([145.253.228.165]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rG4DP-0002OD-85; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 16:34:56 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=vodafonemail.de; s=vfde-mb-mr2-23sep; t=1703108082; bh=JiGXtF7s2Mu1O1C7YXoFfDMq8RlgYVHV1pHK3B6O0YQ=; h=Message-ID:Date:User-Agent:Subject:To:References:From: Content-Language:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:From; b=RK5dqnH90S7dQP6O7YUCmIJBirW56kOe6SXWEpwVUW7TmIHe80pjUS6YCCT68epVn gNkfsw/ZCWJjyRc5ZzGMzaOJqFdng+6moK8OjfbuSzsMFrjye9XJssp9OH9ikFoVvn BArxwQ91fIXvjcJoKbjMec0XtD66Dgq3kf265PPY= Original-Received: from smtp.vodafone.de (unknown [10.0.0.2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mr5.vodafonemail.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4SwRfT3qgFz1yDC; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 21:34:41 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from [192.168.178.41] (port-92-196-48-242.dynamic.as20676.net [92.196.48.242]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.vodafone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4SwRfG70d9zHnfr; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 21:34:27 +0000 (UTC) Content-Language: de-DE-frami, en-US In-Reply-To: <87o7emosib.fsf@red-bean.com> X-purgate-type: clean X-purgate: clean X-purgate-size: 775 X-purgate-ID: 155817::1703108077-54FF4693-728110ED/0/0 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=145.253.228.165; envelope-from=jschmidt4gnu@vodafonemail.de; helo=mr5.vodafonemail.de X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:314022 Archived-At: On 2023-12-19 21:18, Karl Fogel wrote: > Thanks for talking through the possibilities.  We disagree about modal > dialog behavior, but being maintainer means making decisions sometimes, > and it's helpful that you've made one here. Sorry for chiming in here, but this issue intrigued me. So I tried some other command where read-multiple-choice is used, namely `kill-buffer' hen you try to kill a modified buffer. And in that case, I could very well C-x o out of the multiple choice prompt. For example, to save the buffer currently being killed with C-x C-s behind the back of the prompt. So it seems that in principle read-multiple-choice should be able to do that. Probably it needs to be called this way or that way to allow that, I don't know.