From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13594: 24.2.92; [PATCH] compilation-start doesn't consider nil OUTWIN Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 18:32:37 +0100 Message-ID: <5117D9B5.5090203@gmx.at> References: <87sj5apclq.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87r4ktoinh.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87mwvhxehw.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87zjzfz0nq.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <51161554.9010609@gmx.at> <8738x4o5cp.fsf@mail.jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1360517631 14419 80.91.229.3 (10 Feb 2013 17:33:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 17:33:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 13594@debbugs.gnu.org, Leo Liu To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 10 18:34:12 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U4an5-000273-Gk for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 18:34:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53049 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U4amm-00070B-8o for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 12:33:52 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46982) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U4amj-0006yN-8g for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 12:33:50 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U4amh-0003Qa-04 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 12:33:49 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:43814) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U4amg-0003QW-T6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 12:33:46 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U4amw-0008Ap-2W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 12:34:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 17:34:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13594 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 13594-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13594.136051758731328 (code B ref 13594); Sun, 10 Feb 2013 17:34:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13594) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Feb 2013 17:33:07 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49271 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U4am2-00089E-UX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 12:33:07 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:61522) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U4am0-000894-5Y for 13594@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 12:33:05 -0500 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([10.1.76.12]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmx001) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MKwO6-1U4alj0rsO-0004sB for <13594@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 18:32:47 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 10 Feb 2013 17:32:46 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-44-112.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.44.112]) [62.47.44.112] by mail.gmx.net (mp012) with SMTP; 10 Feb 2013 18:32:46 +0100 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+OcjcnNaOO0pXZphlce+Qx4JK1BEvWVssBd0Y2rM DjHiaOU5ks117y In-Reply-To: <8738x4o5cp.fsf@mail.jurta.org> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:71015 Archived-At: > But such some window at any cost should be harmless when the caller goes > to use the returned window e.g. to get its buffer with `window-buffer', etc. Returning the selected window is harmless. > This is why using a hidden window is better, despite its invisibility > the window will be still correct in all its properties. Deleting the last visible Emacs frame and subsequently switching off your machine is not entirely harmless. martin