From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13594: 24.2.92; [PATCH] compilation-start doesn't consider nil OUTWIN Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 10:59:48 +0100 Message-ID: <5114CC94.6050703@gmx.at> References: <87sj5apclq.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87r4ktoinh.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87mwvhxehw.fsf@mail.jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1360317670 19571 80.91.229.3 (8 Feb 2013 10:01:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 10:01:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 13594@debbugs.gnu.org, Leo Liu To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 08 11:01:30 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U3kls-0004FS-O0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 11:01:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43807 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U3klZ-0006my-R9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 05:01:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56579) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U3klR-0006km-W5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 05:01:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U3klQ-00012p-S9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 05:01:01 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:37529) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U3klQ-00012l-Op for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 05:01:00 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U3klS-0008GK-Lk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 05:01:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 10:01:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13594 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 13594-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13594.136031761331698 (code B ref 13594); Fri, 08 Feb 2013 10:01:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13594) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Feb 2013 10:00:13 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42993 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U3kke-0008F7-0T for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 05:00:12 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:51028) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U3kkV-0008EW-Of for 13594@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 05:00:10 -0500 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([10.1.76.35]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmx001) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0M7nFW-1Upxc50MAC-00vKkI for <13594@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 10:59:57 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 08 Feb 2013 09:59:56 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-40-201.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.40.201]) [62.47.40.201] by mail.gmx.net (mp035) with SMTP; 08 Feb 2013 10:59:56 +0100 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18nxawNK2InKZXus24LNUQhWUtpay+roFD9VJlWNG rtta2jXLBpQqSw In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:70878 Archived-At: > It's a valid return value, but only when display-buffer is *unable to > display the buffer*. It is *very* rare to be unable to do so. E.g. it > will never happen unless at least one of pop-up-frame-function or > display-buffer-fallback-action is changed. To make it happen you have to make all existing windows dedicated and display some other buffer, inhibit popping up new windows, and inhibit popping up new frames. martin