From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eric M. Ludlam" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: CEDET version Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 19:04:54 -0500 Message-ID: <5109B526.30006@siege-engine.com> References: <87txqgjfmx.fsf@mail36.net> <9c38xzv0q7.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <76ehhjw8bb.fsf_-_@fencepost.gnu.org> <87wqv62vu1.fsf@engster.org> <0ca9s2ht87.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <50FE1044.1010307@siege-engine.com> <50FF17E0.8090208@siege-engine.com> <877gn42vsw.fsf@engster.org> <50FFE302.7080107@siege-engine.com> <871udby6q3.fsf@engster.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1359590717 9098 80.91.229.3 (31 Jan 2013 00:05:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:05:17 +0000 (UTC) To: Glenn Morris , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 31 01:05:36 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U0hek-0001oa-Qm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 01:05:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40224 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U0heP-00089d-Am for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 19:05:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46787) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U0heL-00088d-GD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 19:05:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U0heK-0004UK-Hd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 19:05:05 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ve0-f175.google.com ([209.85.128.175]:60249) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U0heF-0004PD-KR; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 19:04:59 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-ve0-f175.google.com with SMTP id db12so1570712veb.34 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 16:04:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=vhcGgu+pqihZOhyEIWP9eMV6fwPNGjksuoaSIzsh2Qo=; b=M6eUBplx3Dl/1vXocbNn364EHSiH8NS3ugV+JjZwrV+35THYe9K8ROZSUf3t+DJWBm XQ2y9V3bb0sQb2hf9FtnIqrk+/bW/pSaBe2jkT5cvjm2gS/zL7H5utOZj2k4kAJNYVD9 p8mN0us/K91o5UiCsNMzVeVGUFolsXzPKvDH7U7n3jU9dE+gI4uhFoFkAv9frmtwJmMt ZXGa6+Ywo+pBK4Mpzp4KN1qWtyDBASp18wbxbqtfhfumQFukdnk2lzs2v/W7djovd/Ns aP+QAW5JnI1HsVRtEvh/5dlsr2LzbMNbQ/Z2F13YdZp2uD7yaODaVaNBV7S4KqViBjbm 3CzA== X-Received: by 10.58.48.231 with SMTP id p7mr2214338ven.11.1359590698117; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 16:04:58 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.201] (pool-72-74-140-235.bstnma.fios.verizon.net. [72.74.140.235]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x17sm2893294vdi.1.2013.01.30.16.04.55 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 30 Jan 2013 16:04:56 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.3a1pre) Gecko/20091222 Shredder/3.1a1pre In-Reply-To: <871udby6q3.fsf@engster.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.85.128.175 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:156718 Archived-At: On 01/23/2013 03:39 PM, David Engster wrote: > Eric M. Ludlam writes: >>> For the future, I'd rather get rid of all those separate version numbers >>> for all the sub-packages. They may have been useful back in the day, but >>> I don't think they're worth the hassle now. Let's just have one CEDET >>> version and be done with it. >> >> ...we could just remove all the version numbers, and call it CEDET 2.0. >> >> If there are dependencies out there on the version numbers, it >> shouldn't be too hard to redirect to the overall cedet version. >> >> Doing that will be more work than just running my script. I've got >> cub-scout overload the next two weeks coming on with a pinewood >> derby. Is there a time crunch on this? > > We cannot do that for the coming release, since the emacs-24 branch has > been in a freeze for quite some time now. So please let's first bump the > versions, which I'll merge to emacs-24, and then rip out the versioning > code, which I can merge to current trunk. Hi David, In CEDET / bzr repository, change 8466 contains minor version bumping and making the comments match the variables. Thanks Eric