From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Davis Herring" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Gtk tabs in emacs, new branch. Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 10:16:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51053.130.55.132.80.1270919810.squirrel@webmail.lanl.gov> References: <30298845.656931270806476838.JavaMail.www@wwinf4631> <4BBF0C6C.7000909@swipnet.se> <4BC011F5.9010505@swipnet.se> <4BC0A2EC.3060807@swipnet.se> <50923.130.55.132.80.1270917734.squirrel@webmail.lanl.gov> <4BC0B146.5020802@swipnet.se> Reply-To: herring@lanl.gov NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1270919829 11148 80.91.229.12 (10 Apr 2010 17:17:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 17:17:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Stefan Monnier , "Emacs Dev \[emacs-devel\]" To: Jan =?iso-8859-1?Q?Dj=E4rv?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 10 19:17:06 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O0eIn-0000is-Gp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 19:17:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40813 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O0eIm-0001xP-JT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:17:00 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1O0eIh-0001x5-0T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:16:55 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=58281 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O0eIf-0001wt-RA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:16:54 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O0eIe-0006SU-OT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:16:53 -0400 Original-Received: from proofpoint2.lanl.gov ([204.121.3.26]:59900) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O0eIe-0006Rt-FC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:16:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mailrelay2.lanl.gov (mailrelay2.lanl.gov [128.165.4.103]) by proofpoint2.lanl.gov (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o3AHGo3j004098; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 11:16:50 -0600 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mailrelay2.lanl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6261B163B526; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 11:16:50 -0600 (MDT) X-NIE-2-Virus-Scanner: amavisd-new at mailrelay2.lanl.gov Original-Received: from webmail1.lanl.gov (webmail1.lanl.gov [128.165.4.106]) by mailrelay2.lanl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DA51163B524; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 11:16:50 -0600 (MDT) Original-Received: by webmail1.lanl.gov (Postfix, from userid 48) id 4BDD31CA8186; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 11:16:50 -0600 (MDT) Original-Received: from 130.55.132.80 (SquirrelMail authenticated user 196434) by webmail.lanl.gov with HTTP; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 10:16:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4BC0B146.5020802@swipnet.se> User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8-5.el5_4.10.lanl1 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=1.12.8161:2.4.5, 1.2.40, 4.0.166 definitions=2010-04-10_01:2010-02-06, 2010-04-10, 2010-04-10 signatures=0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:123447 Archived-At: >> This isn't necessary, is it? > > What is "this"? Sorry -- I meant the window covering the whole frame and associated problems. My whole message was practically identical to David's anyway (except for the comprehensibility), so we need not worry about it. Davis -- This product is sold by volume, not by mass. If it appears too dense or too sparse, it is because mass-energy conversion has occurred during shipping.