From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eric M. Ludlam" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: CEDET version Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 08:17:54 -0500 Message-ID: <50FFE302.7080107@siege-engine.com> References: <87txqgjfmx.fsf@mail36.net> <9c38xzv0q7.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <76ehhjw8bb.fsf_-_@fencepost.gnu.org> <87wqv62vu1.fsf@engster.org> <0ca9s2ht87.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <50FE1044.1010307@siege-engine.com> <50FF17E0.8090208@siege-engine.com> <877gn42vsw.fsf@engster.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1358947102 31278 80.91.229.3 (23 Jan 2013 13:18:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 13:18:22 +0000 (UTC) To: Glenn Morris , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 23 14:18:39 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ty0Do-00034h-Bm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 14:18:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50349 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ty0DU-0002vV-76 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 08:18:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42637) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ty0DO-0002sp-Ns for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 08:18:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ty0DN-0000ep-0b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 08:18:06 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ve0-f169.google.com ([209.85.128.169]:46175) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ty0DG-0000dK-MC; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 08:17:58 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-ve0-f169.google.com with SMTP id cy12so914739veb.14 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 05:17:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=nNWpzZ3KpxVROBmbUnwoPggfAU9ArnIc3Q7j4SevJow=; b=wk7nzxvvl9yMcuUwg/cMpiJaBi/vELJg8MYm5dDIxNLi9slXruJyz6zPty/QXf7aGa HBxszMbU4dKV7tj+RsrfzTphH2Cxk3Lc4vdB9N79S7Mtsk5ffZT8JTFARDsJOi7nAHUr cs5+7FPpHIucVLpIfG4+7nQHDaRsGNALmK1xTEOF/QidbshXeFJo8uzkOFEQeh7HjAyl k8eOPmZs7k+Wye8KazZCDAOKYQoKIBQJl0v/nQ4xPUt2oo6OJyLpPt9WF4mIRUvojz+a H4STEWpK7U+M1a0nT91Yqd8OmP0bZkh+C9dBHSOmH5g93IvRPl1grzcGZAZgrfoa5T5f YmnA== X-Received: by 10.52.21.13 with SMTP id r13mr1063411vde.37.1358947077461; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 05:17:57 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.201] (pool-72-74-140-235.bstnma.fios.verizon.net. [72.74.140.235]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fb16sm11288674veb.9.2013.01.23.05.17.55 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 23 Jan 2013 05:17:56 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.3a1pre) Gecko/20091222 Shredder/3.1a1pre In-Reply-To: <877gn42vsw.fsf@engster.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.85.128.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:156599 Archived-At: On 01/23/2013 02:38 AM, David Engster wrote: > Eric M. Ludlam writes: >> Ah, thanks for clarifying. I hadn't realized the comment and variable >> were going out of sync. A side-effect of using an incomplete script. >> I can update the script to keep those in sync in the future the CEDET >> repository. The variable is the correct version. >> >> I'm not certain about the 'beta' though. I usually put a number after >> the beta, like 2.1beta1 or some such. > > OK, but what should be done now? > > If you bump the numbers in CEDET upstream to a stable version, I can > merge that change to the emacs-24 branch. Ok. There were pretty big changes in the file system and merges across all the parts of CEDET to warrant a version bump. Or... > For the future, I'd rather get rid of all those separate version numbers > for all the sub-packages. They may have been useful back in the day, but > I don't think they're worth the hassle now. Let's just have one CEDET > version and be done with it. ...we could just remove all the version numbers, and call it CEDET 2.0. If there are dependencies out there on the version numbers, it shouldn't be too hard to redirect to the overall cedet version. Doing that will be more work than just running my script. I've got cub-scout overload the next two weeks coming on with a pinewood derby. Is there a time crunch on this? Eric