From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13479: Cross Compiling for ARM Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 18:55:07 +0100 Message-ID: <50F98C7B.8090708@gmx.at> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1358531782 21687 80.91.229.3 (18 Jan 2013 17:56:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 17:56:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Ross Biro , 13479@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 18 18:56:39 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TwGBB-0001yP-DZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 18:56:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59666 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TwGAu-00051a-P5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 12:56:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53798) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TwGAq-0004sr-Js for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 12:56:17 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TwGAp-00037n-4Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 12:56:16 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:33551) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TwGAp-00037i-2E for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 12:56:15 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TwGBa-0001pF-68 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 12:57:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 17:57:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13479 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 13479-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13479.13585317666947 (code B ref 13479); Fri, 18 Jan 2013 17:57:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13479) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jan 2013 17:56:06 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39015 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TwGAf-0001ny-DB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 12:56:06 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:58971) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TwGAb-0001nW-OI for 13479@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 12:56:02 -0500 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([10.1.76.4]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmx001) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MGlNX-1Tiq2K0BX7-00DWr3 for <13479@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 18:55:13 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 18 Jan 2013 17:55:12 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-38-39.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.38.39]) [62.47.38.39] by mail.gmx.net (mp004) with SMTP; 18 Jan 2013 18:55:12 +0100 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18i7QZhX34ixZMNayB9UODrYF2xPJpYBIM2yhSijd 3hE6JtnkH5GY86 In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:69987 Archived-At: > Most/all calls to Elisp from C should protect themselves with calls to > Ffboundp or similar, indeed. Martin, could you take care of that? I'm not sure. If most/all calls should be protected we'd better provide call_[1-4]_safe function for this purpose. But I haven't the slightest idea of what might happen when some of these functions don't get called. martin