From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13200: 24.1.50; Ruby Mode Indentation after Here Docs Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 20:06:34 +0400 Message-ID: <50D72C0A.2070508@yandex.ru> References: <87hanmmf5u.fsf@saturn.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87a9t6kyho.wl%ded-law@ddoherty.net> <20693.65320.439193.221152@gnu.org> <87r4mgzuys.fsf@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1356278881 30537 80.91.229.3 (23 Dec 2012 16:08:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 16:08:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ded-law@ddoherty.net, 13200@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 23 17:08:14 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Tmo5z-0001nA-8Z for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 17:08:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51073 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tmo5l-0008D9-7D for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 11:07:57 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38007) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tmo5a-00084M-0q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 11:07:54 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tmo5R-0006u8-Ng for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 11:07:45 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:46695) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tmo5R-0006ty-KI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 11:07:37 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tmo5q-00011Y-FL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 11:08:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 16:08:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13200 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 13200-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13200.13562788263867 (code B ref 13200); Sun, 23 Dec 2012 16:08:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13200) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Dec 2012 16:07:06 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56946 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tmo4v-00010K-K1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 11:07:05 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-la0-f54.google.com ([209.85.215.54]:39726) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tmo4t-00010C-OQ for 13200@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 11:07:04 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-la0-f54.google.com with SMTP id j13so7417624lah.41 for <13200@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 08:06:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=cAQbcLdPQ9R6VltnZHL01umrWXnWUxnHMkigx8380iI=; b=j1cAceRzLbZ8nnl7DxmQvsQnZEsfv2MdhQngHu+39exLnzFSiuSsVFlueoELhSLh2p lQlTbj3PeLsFL5h9Jf4FtKydxTz0iZ3f8cCp/PKlFOwv1KDZMLGb8pBUq35B7XHhSM3/ JVaexv1NngaZgK/Xi/Gom0eJlKAlL1UZUK5KkuQ8DM73DIThmPYiqmrcayZH7+xFFICO k2v0ZyeLcuVMTdFuqVCkTlkyWq7Igc3qQcHIq7CEqyF9sbe3vdhstYOPijV3o4gRpxZ1 00y7sZ9wwsi5x9oaMupEJEMlK5froxfwKkb/vUMlPl2meoLCY1GceP8fSfmgtwYAqdBV /x3A== X-Received: by 10.152.148.129 with SMTP id ts1mr18055982lab.19.1356278795914; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 08:06:35 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([178.252.98.87]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k7sm6553452lbf.4.2012.12.23.08.06.33 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 23 Dec 2012 08:06:34 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:68956 Archived-At: On 23.12.2012 19:41, Stefan Monnier wrote: >>> package.el should be able to ignore your "out of date" elpa version if >>> the bundled version is more recent, so it should work even if you don't >>> uninstall the elpa version. >> By ignore, do you mean it won't show up in the list of packages >> available to install? > > No, I mean it should not be added to load-path during startup. That may add to the confusion in this case. "I installed ruby-mode 1.1, but it didn't do anything!", or something. >> The person who uploaded ruby-mode to Tom Tromey's ELPA (it's also >> present in Marmalade) independently raised the package version to 1.1, >> so it's higher than the bundled version. > > Ah! Also, a few Ruby-related packages (rinari, rspec-mode) were set to depend on this version, but that's rectified now. >> Do you think we should bump it to 1.2? > > Depends. Is it a fork? I meant, bump the version of the bundled ruby-mode. The "ruby-mode 1.1" doesn't contain any substantial changes, AFAICT, so there's nothing to merge. But it is present in both Marmalade and the original ELPA. I opened an issue at the repo of the Marmalade uploader (https://github.com/resure/ruby-mode/issues/1), and if that doesn't result in anything, I'll escalate to the current Marmalade maintainer. There's no issue tracker for Tromey's archive. Maybe I should email him directly, instead.