From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13041: 24.2; diacritic-fold-search Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2012 12:35:37 +0100 Message-ID: <50C32609.8000704@gmx.at> References: <20121130182205.C722F14B8D@panix1.panix.com> <87ip8fjzwn.fsf@gnu.org> <871uf2647i.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <50C1C6CC.9020103@gmx.at> <87ehj18l9p.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <83boe5lzul.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1354966610 25859 80.91.229.3 (8 Dec 2012 11:36:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2012 11:36:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: perin@panix.com, 13041@debbugs.gnu.org, perin@acm.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 08 12:37:01 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ThIiG-00051O-5S for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 12:36:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41285 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ThIi3-0004rr-Vb for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 06:36:43 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34379) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ThIi0-0004rZ-6k for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 06:36:41 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ThIhy-0004b7-Ob for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 06:36:40 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:49718) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ThIhy-0004b2-Kb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 06:36:38 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ThIiM-0005Ge-5o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 06:37:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2012 11:37:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13041 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 13041-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13041.135496657220117 (code B ref 13041); Sat, 08 Dec 2012 11:37:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13041) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Dec 2012 11:36:12 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59925 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ThIhX-0005EP-RU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 06:36:12 -0500 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]:41164) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ThIhW-0005EJ-IM for 13041@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 06:36:11 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 08 Dec 2012 11:35:45 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-55-242.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.55.242]) [62.47.55.242] by mail.gmx.net (mp002) with SMTP; 08 Dec 2012 12:35:45 +0100 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18/O2Yt5I0/J8dUqf1zplFn9zdR1lJiCkVd9QRFzK x74JmDDoXxg5SS In-Reply-To: <83boe5lzul.fsf@gnu.org> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:68183 Archived-At: > I don't know if it's more difficult. After all, the primitives you > need to (a) find out whether there's a display string at given buffer > position, and (b) access its text, are already there, ready to be > used. Moreover, there's even a C function that searches the current > buffer for a specific Lisp string, which you could use as a model for > this feature. I think that mirroring/cloning (part of) the current buffer in a special search buffer would be the cheapest solution. The search buffer would contain the normalized text, be built only when normalization is needed and be rebuilt whenever a search option or the buffer text changes. I don't know whether `buffer-swap-text' could be used here. martin