From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12502: 24.2.50; Debugger messes up current-buffer Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 18:45:27 +0200 Message-ID: <5061DFA7.5050309@gmx.at> References: <50605429.10900@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1348591575 1928 80.91.229.3 (25 Sep 2012 16:46:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 16:46:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 12502@debbugs.gnu.org To: Helmut Eller Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 25 18:46:18 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TGYGw-00041T-Qd for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 18:46:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42648 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TGYGr-0003Kl-Uf for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 12:46:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47081) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TGYGp-0003K6-4D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 12:46:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TGYGo-0000IS-74 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 12:46:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:45921) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TGYGo-0000Hn-3Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 12:46:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TGYIk-0001uA-0h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 12:48:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 16:48:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12502 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 12502-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12502.13485916297265 (code B ref 12502); Tue, 25 Sep 2012 16:48:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12502) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Sep 2012 16:47:09 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55467 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TGYHs-0001t7-Qq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 12:47:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.23]:52153) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TGYHq-0001sz-Ro for 12502@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 12:47:08 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 25 Sep 2012 16:45:05 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-32-73.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.32.73]) [62.47.32.73] by mail.gmx.net (mp035) with SMTP; 25 Sep 2012 18:45:05 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18yAgFvZLUyBhB0/nXgZx7wY0Cmgl7+or7A2YCdD3 TSeYkgHHZALK1y In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:64883 Archived-At: > Yes, that seems to fix the problem. But the save-exursion in line 218 > looks now supsisously irrelevant. Maybe. There's another one nested inside. I know next to nothing about the internals of the debugger. > I'l look for problems, but I'm not sure what the correct/incorrect > behaviour regarding window management should be. The old > save-window-excursion worked pretty well for me. It didn't work at all for people showing the debugger in an extra frame. martin