From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: cl-assertion error in doc-view Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 00:24:08 +0200 Message-ID: <505B9788.5030302@gmx.at> References: <87obl1yk0q.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <505B519E.8060403@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1348179835 28506 80.91.229.3 (20 Sep 2012 22:23:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 22:23:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 21 00:24:00 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TEpA7-0001n0-Cb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 00:23:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55177 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TEpA2-0002qx-9m for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 18:23:54 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41258) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TEp9u-0002qd-Qh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 18:23:52 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TEp9t-0001Rq-Tz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 18:23:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.23]:55846) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TEp9t-0001Rh-Ju for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 18:23:45 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 20 Sep 2012 22:23:44 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-58-99.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.58.99]) [62.47.58.99] by mail.gmx.net (mp071) with SMTP; 21 Sep 2012 00:23:44 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+smD18D3qsrL1y3LDxRFWy1lZrMkAw7gazhj2V1S ZUH685GRoU64yi In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 213.165.64.23 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:153413 Archived-At: > Using switch-to-buffer or set-window-buffer is incorrect since this > function doesn't know if there's an actual intention to display the > buffer, nor where it will be displayed (and the selected-window may be > inappropriate, dedicated, minibuffer-only That's the reason why I suggested `switch-to-buffer' with FORCE-SAME-WINDOW nil. ). > So we need a different solution that does not rely on displaying > the buffer. What's the purpose of a thing called `doc-view-display' if it's not to display something? martin