From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: threads and kill-buffer Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 18:13:30 +0200 Message-ID: <504A1D2A.80500@gmx.at> References: <87a9x55xvd.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <5046D668.4010105@yandex.ru> <50471EEB.9030405@gmx.at> <837gs8e8n7.fsf@gnu.org> <50484E88.4080804@gmx.at> <83lignd1o8.fsf@gnu.org> <5048B623.9050802@gmx.at> <83ehmfciag.fsf@gnu.org> <5048C98A.4070303@gmx.at> <5048DF46.9000003@gmx.at> <5049C3DE.6020403@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1347034405 22820 80.91.229.3 (7 Sep 2012 16:13:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 16:13:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: tromey@redhat.com, Eli Zaretskii , dmantipov@yandex.ru, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 07 18:13:25 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TA1BG-0008Uv-HR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 18:13:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36284 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TA1BD-0001wz-D4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 12:13:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48235) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TA1B5-0001v5-TP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 12:13:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TA1B4-0006sC-TS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 12:13:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]:57564) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TA1B4-0006s4-Ip for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 12:13:06 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 07 Sep 2012 16:13:04 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-55-62.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.55.62]) [62.47.55.62] by mail.gmx.net (mp010) with SMTP; 07 Sep 2012 18:13:04 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+SdZ9sL3SSCc+l+zEWUja8IE0ollg4+brEXgysy3 eF99gpnpPhM6DJ In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 213.165.64.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:153159 Archived-At: >> So killing a buffer will change the current buffer when it's displayed >> in a window and leave it unchanged otherwise. Would we really like such >> behavior? > > No, killing a buffer will undisplay it from wherever it is displayed > (as is the case now). But this has no influence of what > `current-buffer' is. Undisplaying changes the current buffer, provided it's displayed in the selected window, with the next command. martin