From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12251: 24.2.50; crash in note_mouse_highlight Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 19:18:34 +0200 Message-ID: <503665EA.2000600@gmx.at> References: <87obm4ayyn.fsf@gnu.org> <83fw7gaxyx.fsf@gnu.org> <87k3wsax0k.fsf@gnu.org> <83ehn0aw3p.fsf@gnu.org> <87sjbfhcii.fsf@gnu.org> <83vcgaam5w.fsf@gnu.org> <5035EE6B.50208@gmx.at> <87sjbd9253.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1345742320 20096 80.91.229.3 (23 Aug 2012 17:18:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 17:18:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 12251@debbugs.gnu.org To: sds@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 23 19:18:41 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1T4b3I-0004mO-RI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 19:18:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51016 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T4b3H-0005Wl-5h for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 13:18:39 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48404) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T4b3A-0005WX-5p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 13:18:37 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T4b39-0004SH-B2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 13:18:32 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:35758) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T4b39-0004Ry-7d for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 13:18:31 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T4b3d-0006Yw-OF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 13:19:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 17:19:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12251 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 12251-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12251.134574233925217 (code B ref 12251); Thu, 23 Aug 2012 17:19:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12251) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Aug 2012 17:18:59 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45304 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T4b3b-0006Yg-9d for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 13:18:59 -0400 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.23]:43367) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T4b3Y-0006YY-UI for 12251@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 13:18:57 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 23 Aug 2012 17:18:24 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-45-20.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.45.20]) [62.47.45.20] by mail.gmx.net (mp071) with SMTP; 23 Aug 2012 19:18:24 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+q0jxXP6+qDiyHJwJ5Imuc1xL+/n5NqudrFPROc1 eNk6JdULCD2UbE In-Reply-To: <87sjbd9253.fsf@gnu.org> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:63434 Archived-At: >> Shouldn't the window be live here? > > definitely! Can you try running it a while with such a check (that is, using WINDOW_LIVE_P instead of WINDOWP)? martin