all messages for Emacs-related lists mirrored at yhetil.org
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Antipov <dmantipov@yandex.ru>
To: Chong Yidong <cyd@gnu.org>
Cc: Stefan Monnier <monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA>, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r109327: Generalize INTERNAL_FIELD between buffers, keyboards and frames.
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 11:14:12 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <502211C4.1010404@yandex.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87r4rigihu.fsf@gnu.org>

On 08/08/2012 07:39 AM, Chong Yidong wrote:

> Another problem, which I haven't seen mentioned in this thread, is that
> when you see C code which does FVAR (x, y) the natural assumption is
> that x and y are C variables.  So these macros hurt code readability.
>
> The introduction of BVAR also violated this principle, and I'm not eager
> to see the problem compounded.

It looks like we should think about how to redesign BVARs and KVARs so
that it should be suitable both for GC and concurrency development.

> I think FSET/WSET/PSET/PGET/etc should be removed from the trunk, at
> least for now.  I recommend moving the generational GC work to a branch.

Look at the size of changes I did just for a few days. This is just a
preliminary changes needed to implement write barriers on top of them.
Each pointer store is a subject to handle; most probably each source
file will be affected. I suppose that new GC tree will look so different
so the final merge will be a tremendous task on a few weeks. So I'm
thinking about 2-stage approach: preliminary work is in trunk (where
it might be used for concurrency branch and other development), and
new GC (barriers and core GC bits) is in branch.

Dmitry




  reply	other threads:[~2012-08-08  7:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <E1SwCK8-0001PC-3m@vcs.savannah.gnu.org>
2012-08-01 10:33 ` [Emacs-diffs] /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r109327: Generalize INTERNAL_FIELD between buffers, keyboards and frames Stefan Monnier
2012-08-01 12:04   ` Dmitry Antipov
2012-08-01 14:58     ` Paul Eggert
2012-08-01 16:52       ` Dmitry Antipov
2012-08-01 17:38       ` Tom Tromey
2012-08-01 21:04         ` Paul Eggert
2012-08-02  5:28         ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2012-08-01 15:01     ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-08-01 18:02       ` Dmitry Antipov
2012-08-02 15:28         ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-08-01 23:52     ` Stefan Monnier
2012-08-02  4:12       ` Dmitry Antipov
2012-08-02  5:56         ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2012-08-02  7:47           ` Dmitry Antipov
2012-08-02  9:30             ` Juanma Barranquero
2012-08-02 16:07             ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-08-02 15:45           ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-08-02 21:28             ` Paul Eggert
2012-08-03  6:27               ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-08-03  6:52                 ` Paul Eggert
2012-08-02 23:38           ` Richard Stallman
2012-08-02 15:34         ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-08-03  7:42         ` Stefan Monnier
2012-08-03  8:31           ` Dmitry Antipov
2012-08-03 18:58             ` Paul Eggert
2012-08-03 22:52               ` Stefan Monnier
2012-08-04 16:31                 ` Paul Eggert
2012-08-05 15:03                   ` Dmitry Antipov
2012-08-06 10:54                     ` Stefan Monnier
2012-08-06 11:44                       ` Dmitry Antipov
2012-08-06 16:31                         ` Stefan Monnier
2012-08-06 17:43                           ` Stefan Monnier
2012-08-08  7:22                         ` Chong Yidong
2012-08-05 14:59               ` Dmitry Antipov
2012-08-05 15:23                 ` Paul Eggert
2012-08-05 20:29                   ` Miles Bader
2012-08-03 22:50             ` Stefan Monnier
2012-08-03 23:11               ` Wojciech Meyer
2012-08-08  3:39           ` Chong Yidong
2012-08-08  7:14             ` Dmitry Antipov [this message]
2012-08-08  7:46               ` Chong Yidong
2012-08-08 10:18                 ` Dmitry Antipov
2012-08-08 12:41             ` Stefan Monnier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=502211C4.1010404@yandex.ru \
    --to=dmantipov@yandex.ru \
    --cc=cyd@gnu.org \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.