From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11939: 24.1; `save-buffers-kill-emacs' loses minibuffer focus when it calls `list-processes' Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 11:43:27 +0200 Message-ID: <5011113F.8070307@gmx.at> References: <5002BEC6.3040106@gmx.at> <893E59C2E4F94D6EB910560C9E8C42CD@us.oracle.com> <5002EAF4.5080107@gmx.at> <6F73D04E8EE144E780D602DFEBA48E7B@us.oracle.com> <5003DAF2.2060400@gmx.at> <50043C3D.7090201@gmx.at> <208B7D7BB4BC4339ADCC1166F76C1CD2@us.oracle.com> <500449B7.6070309@gmx.at> <023F63BCBF9442EBAEDCCE9D8A59E5E4@us.oracle.com> <5005354E.6040306@gmx.at> <62CF21F0010048E2BC1391192EB943FF@us.oracle.com> <5006E14B.3000407@gmx.at> <47731CC5C6EC4ED9AB9E9E05E259572C@us.oracle.com> <5007E47B.3050907@gmx.at> <446B437450EC47968D15C20D7142296B@us.oracle.com> <500A8C0E.4040006@gmx.at> <96A974694CF64567A3EAB85185AB3A5C@us.oracle.com> <500BBE6F.6020007@gmx.at> <1403DD3D67534F53BC023CC99A258DF5@us.oracle.com> <500D1A93.606@gmx.at> <500E993F.7020502@gmx.at> <23244A80D9924C4D967C3364D8A6F616@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1343295867 26228 80.91.229.3 (26 Jul 2012 09:44:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 09:44:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 11939@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 26 11:44:26 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SuKcL-0006pT-91 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 11:44:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48590 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SuKcK-0006uJ-MG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 05:44:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35333) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SuKcD-0006np-OL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 05:44:22 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SuKc8-0003eZ-NN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 05:44:17 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:59039) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SuKc8-0003eV-K3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 05:44:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SuKik-0006Vf-1P for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 05:51:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 09:51:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11939 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 11939-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11939.134329621924951 (code B ref 11939); Thu, 26 Jul 2012 09:51:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11939) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jul 2012 09:50:19 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40346 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SuKi2-0006UO-Sy for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 05:50:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]:52729) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SuKi0-0006UG-GY for 11939@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 05:50:17 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 26 Jul 2012 09:43:25 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-53-226.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.53.226]) [62.47.53.226] by mail.gmx.net (mp040) with SMTP; 26 Jul 2012 11:43:25 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+HUjdLACSHtqYcJahKy6kT973z63izg623SHr3TM nmtLwdJJy/cSOx In-Reply-To: <23244A80D9924C4D967C3364D8A6F616@us.oracle.com> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:62402 Archived-At: > I speculated to you > about putting the focus redirection instead on `post-command-hook', but you said > that was a bad idea and proposed to "use `after-make-frame-functions'". I am > not sure what you meant by that, but the test above, which uses that hook, did > not work, in any case: the input was not redirected to the minibuffer frame. I did so because you said that you experienced some delay when processing input and had the first characetr entered swallowed in some way. So I attributed this behavior to the use of `post-command-hook' and was suggesting an alternative method. martin