From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: merge emacs-pretest-bug and emacs-devel Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 03:39:07 -0400 Message-ID: <4xodhbhois.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <14wsw1bfmq.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1186990556 1989 80.91.229.12 (13 Aug 2007 07:35:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 07:35:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 13 09:35:52 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IKUSs-0001RQ-V4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 09:35:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IKUSs-0000V0-Gy for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 03:35:50 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IKUSo-0000Qk-Sz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 03:35:46 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IKUSn-0000Nh-Es for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 03:35:46 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IKUSn-0000NW-9b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 03:35:45 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IKUSn-0002nn-0u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 03:35:45 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IKUW3-0002yr-Pt; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 03:39:07 -0400 X-Spook: Arnett Centro morse AGT. AMME chameleon man David John X-Ran: CAKBiX?B.fL87-_GiMku#C?2BRz^%=0fL0$oUGx@R*\_UFa_AGuIJ@J_SISq'nEv?+V`EE X-Hue: red X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 12 Aug 2007 21:51:38 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:76434 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii wrote: > If we do that, what will happen to the archives of > emacs-pretest-bug, both before and after the merge? I don't think anything should or would happen to the pre-merge archives. I don't really know the answer to the "after" part of your question; but I expect that if the change is done by a mail alias (the easiest way, AFAIK), then no more mails will appear in the e-p-b archives from that point on. If it's possible to get the mailman software to do the forwarding instead, then we could still archive things in e-p-b, before forwarding them on to e-d. This might be nice (though people would probably use e-p-b less than before).