From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Giacomo M Subject: Re: How to export to latex from command line? Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 17:33:42 +0200 Message-ID: <4f7e33b5-7fa0-7e67-40e2-aab41bfd8cd6@gmail.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51536) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bG6dZ-0006RU-9Y for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 11:33:50 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bG6dV-0001TY-Ff for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 11:33:49 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-x232.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::232]:36834) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bG6dV-0001TU-8L for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 11:33:45 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-x232.google.com with SMTP id f126so131947439wma.1 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 08:33:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([212.189.161.135]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x83sm4428908wmx.9.2016.06.23.08.33.43 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 23 Jun 2016 08:33:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Il 23/06/2016 16:48, hymie! ha scritto: > In our last episode, the evil Dr. Lacto had captured our hero, > Giacomo M , who said: >> Dear all, >> >> I would like to export an org file to either tex or pdf from bash. > I have been using this: > ${EMACS} $filename -f org-html-export-to-html -f kill-emacs > > There are similar functions org-latex-export-to-pdf and > org-latex-export-to-latex. I don't think org does plain TeX; I'd be > thrilled if it does. > Thanks, great! by tex I meant latex (as in a metonymy where you use the extension for the language), so no particularly thrilling perspectives implied. Best, Giacomo