From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Riley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: p tags and indenting in Html Mode Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 14:16:15 +0200 Organization: aich tea tea pea dicky riley dot net Message-ID: <4a9e6212.0c58560a.78a1.ffffb4fc@mx.google.com> References: <7ctyzop7gg.fsf@pbourguignon.anevia.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1251893860 10498 80.91.229.12 (2 Sep 2009 12:17:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 12:17:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Lennart Borgman Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 02 14:17:33 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MiomJ-0006At-AR for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Sep 2009 14:17:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42343 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MiomI-0006Lr-Dn for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Sep 2009 08:17:30 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MiolG-0006KL-5L for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Sep 2009 08:16:26 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MiolD-0006JV-In for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Sep 2009 08:16:23 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41205 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MiolC-0006JI-8I for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Sep 2009 08:16:23 -0400 Original-Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.155]:46907) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MiolB-0005JH-4q for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Sep 2009 08:16:21 -0400 Original-Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e21so629217fga.12 for ; Wed, 02 Sep 2009 05:16:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:from:to:cc:subject :organization:references:date:in-reply-to:user-agent:mime-version :content-type; bh=lKLxSfygm1EiSdRAkCsfb2bVRHPSBHVMzAare1rDxt0=; b=T+gjZkSQHjyCiTreQJX0PHGfpJCUkexz20M9UkIkqst/YclJ+O41zlckcoYljc3Ilr MlwZc4QRKbO09w2yNKoHnNjzDbn/05/CaGeqI2+wLdnkAcM8bHLaD7bYnna/o+mFnyln c26rFEs13LfrL0k4YXmFu1AZTlzuJgaMqxCxs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:from:to:cc:subject:organization:references:date :in-reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=bOn64Zlv73/1Inhr1loRR9c+77+IWdwKfLXCecS6zoRopkntvvnM5mq6Zmvk/VkUx1 0y+p++tO53HQ8iomP3rHzjiGAAEvTaVfn63nKpskXy5uLCtEpDDQQFKv+O4QeoIh8EfD Ylwgz6UJ2ZswkwlCFrBfIhYU0ZD12JcVERWNY= Original-Received: by 10.86.34.12 with SMTP id h12mr2441330fgh.25.1251893779624; Wed, 02 Sep 2009 05:16:19 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost ([85.183.18.158]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l12sm2713708fgb.16.2009.09.02.05.16.17 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 02 Sep 2009 05:16:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Lennart Borgman's message of "Wed, 2 Sep 2009 12:00:49 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:67741 Archived-At: Lennart Borgman writes: > On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 12:52 AM, Richard Riley wrote: > >>> As an off-topic aside, is xhtml still moving forward? I thought the W3C >>> had recently decided to ditch it in favor of html 5? Anything I've read >>> suggests that there's no compelling reason to use xhtml for >>> webdesign. >> >> I tried it and regretted a LOT of wasted time and effort. It talked a >> good talk but failed the walk. I was somewhat surprised by some replies >> there that seemed to suggest xhtml was the working, accepted >> standard. It's most certainly not and a LOT of programmers have dropped >> it. So I'm with you on that one. > > > One of the reason to use XHTML is that it is well structured so that > you can use completion. Maybe that would be possible for HTML too, but > there is no completion for HTML in Emacs yet. company-mode seems the most promising for general completion of keywords and so forth, but does not have the smart completion for tag specific attributes you have in nxtml I think (I never used that feature to be honest since html tags are pretty limited anyway). >> I use nxhtml generally, but there are issues I intend to report back to >> Lennart. Its pretty slow > > > Please give me an example of what you find slow. It might be a bug > somewhere. Generally the fontification/format display. I'll email you an example later. > >> and there are some nasty indentation issues with >> certain mixed files (php and x/html). > > > I have added some support to make indentation in mixed files better, > but it is not yet in use. It would be nice to have someone more > helping in developing MuMaMo. > nxhtml has been my main mode for a while now - it's good.