From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs's set-frame-size can not work well with gnome-shell? Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2020 13:10:50 +0100 Message-ID: <4a424bf3-ee08-b114-73ef-287bde14003b@gmx.at> References: <2056a194.3971.16f8d4dd4c5.Coremail.tumashu@163.com> <15405719-d58d-44db-f1df-ad3bb272b2fc@yandex.ru> <437eae9b-ccc1-3875-86b7-1af0e61b6e15@gmx.at> <710da57c-28dc-fab7-81af-0318a9389d6a@yandex.ru> <0e41cd9e-8be3-f67a-6958-7bad38ee1266@gmx.at> <6c86c25b-22df-2b69-34fe-539605f624ba@yandex.ru> <7dd69fe5-4ef4-782c-2fba-031d475f6406@yandex.ru> <32fb4915-be55-f753-5f6c-423a09030fd6@gmx.at> <8b252ea4-5902-d21e-a0d7-cdb3ddbb4e08@yandex.ru> <39d47d8c.4bad.16fcd672191.Coremail.tumashu@163.com> <729d39eb-d0b4-2cc5-cac3-e129a3effa87@yandex.ru> <06c6b6fb-ce6f-456b-6a22-c5a26a0ab297@gmx.at> <50912835-37d2-f15b-8fd1-b6619893d1ce@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="124047"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: "emacs-devel@gnu.org" To: Dmitry Gutov , tumashu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 25 13:13:47 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ivKJv-000WDo-3D for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 25 Jan 2020 13:13:47 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53270 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ivKJu-0004lg-1Z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 25 Jan 2020 07:13:46 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45329) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ivKHM-0003me-DB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Jan 2020 07:11:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ivKHL-0006Le-Fk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Jan 2020 07:11:08 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:53679) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ivKHL-0006Kz-2l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Jan 2020 07:11:07 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1579954253; bh=tWr8mfOYjnOAWDRk9gE6lnuan5ETJIuvqbgCyEUgjDg=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=TY86VIthIMtXfWDv5wzK3ITvxzZTXmhekdZUfxpbblYLGhSeFxENk0XJDgOso30Dp CWIs0JpMdrXXbisaVPYQVMr2AlvDodsjWu2D+cSLzGmJAwz9ScQq4qhWbFS4D/sx9l tkU6M5+nccwx/wUE/79OduD48UEH8ldwG3xYTggI= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([212.95.5.109]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx004 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1M5fIW-1iy4Mo3VNa-007AbD; Sat, 25 Jan 2020 13:10:52 +0100 In-Reply-To: <50912835-37d2-f15b-8fd1-b6619893d1ce@yandex.ru> Content-Language: en-US X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:Z0L+iq20YluMViUKS6y1sdtvjhRTy/pRugZRL/INnsM+v/Wf+b/ elghb05WLJf8PjMpA3LNOc/aM5UwuhctbvLO2rUd3BRiFGDVVUOMOUlzyMlVITe5jiSPQJb ch3pC6DRZ7Vi0ze/+uW+U+YkNtkYL0KF5nZ52Ebxy/z5VBrEcqEtjIws5PF6OvEyy56zUhD cdma6vUWhnYoQJjzhLlkg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:E/K3E/jbuik=:+hlldhUiqQWrOVNwcJKKkA DB88uqzR/QJA0t6aHemavb0ds1ZKIGvQn125Wsnov2iaz5PHfaO4vCD03vjfjHJB1FRbpLxIN EpyDMKipJvBBFdsJEM+ZgcZUUt7qFiCm88W3yB0TMDRQnKyICzzvg1UCW+rldbprLvtz15qNk i7SlcXuHqJfY/zVhgmjdGmrvk1+5AzJPAAk4pDOk7e49soCs1SJIfRzoil1Ns7TZjiD1i6gaw 0NvIl0WzHMCyAUynr+VTUtr7utpubN3Gv3Ub2zph3aIJ/FI+Q/seTKm5gYCqLGEGaoEYgBXer bkRn9/8HiFQn9EphI5kGSkwp6wgGOybNK7h6W+r/V8LvTOIbJo0VBkbJ1gIRYKIp6p8vCYzLi f9WYVXV1YnUDsC+805NqiuY+m3ZA6QXl9Spn+UsY4KfEos1ciyy0e0QSejUlifr8x96CVF68c GWeLDZK5xXCFC6Gb6NWUgVTcUKbrJQtCPeDB5S7TwU/Wp31lDCWYfTDHvYyowricIHa2COUAe ku1UlaEJFy5vZHaRJD36LesKqU+eseTsk/1ZVoYnVF//M2etOI5pSk2VQuL+rjlacvPkvXGQ2 ZLd2/BzkD6ISdHAP0z59IauZIsroSF8T64TmP09v/hvYRjFj7FChUg3ckXKpV35bQOfFyXHhV TGWPK64nGXm3N0q3E5gWjunfDwA4NMwG9mde/acoCElNG6U5Q7sVgrOaoUDbtEWZRuI1dIRPw S9H87BKhxWm5YnGRLbmmWNGh/XP67MCA6O0uVwO+6oT2F6xA6N3MiyI3NbMDzT3dvzJhuCtc X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.18 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:244617 Archived-At: > The first experiment: moving the frame by mode-line is smooth. And it's slow with child frames so we have a major difference here. Correct? > After that: I tried resizing the dragging the border. Which border(s)? > Apparently, it > doesn't account for window scaling, so it resizes to wrong size, and > the window generally shrinked. After that, moving became choppy as > well. Including after I deleted the resized frame and created new > one(s). This sounds interesting. Does scaling work at all with the Lucid build? > In the meantime, resizing the first, "normal" frame works okay. Moving > too (by the title bar). How comes the first frame has a title bar with this specification (setq default-frame-alist '((minibuffer . nil) (undecorated . t) (drag-with-mode-line . t) (border-width . 0) (internal-border-width . 8) (drag-internal-border . t) (menu-bar-lines . 0) (tool-bar-lines . 0))) > GTK: > > Actually, similar story with resizing. You mean similar to the Lucid resizing behavior? > Moving seems smooth enough before and after, with gradual drift toward > top-left (because of the other bug we've mentioned before, probably). Bug#38452, I presume. martin