From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Concern about new binding. Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2021 09:05:50 +0200 Message-ID: <4FF55FBF-573D-4A70-B3FC-682CA25B7ECB@gnu.org> References: <20210202134950.vybbpf3iewbymfjo.ref@Ergus> <20210202134950.vybbpf3iewbymfjo@Ergus> <87zh0mmr54.fsf@gmail.com> <87y2g5smya.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="16839"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android Cc: spacibba@aol.com To: emacs-devel@gnu.org, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=E9vin_Le_Gouguec?= , Richard Stallman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 03 08:06:51 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l7CFX-0004ID-2q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 08:06:51 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42330 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l7CFW-0003dy-4b for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 02:06:50 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56048) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l7CEo-00038R-Bi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 02:06:06 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:37163) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l7CEo-0008MY-2M; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 02:06:06 -0500 Original-Received: from [2a02:14f:80:8d61::1] (port=45332) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1l7CEc-0002Sw-G0; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 02:05:55 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87y2g5smya.fsf@gmail.com> X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:263778 Archived-At: On February 3, 2021 8:08:13 AM GMT+02:00, "K=C3=A9vin Le Gouguec" wrote: > Richard Stallman writes: >=20 > > > See bug#46151=2E > > > > > IIUC the initial request was to have a way to revert shell > output > > > buffers; somewhere along the way the usefulness of a global > binding for > > > revert-buffer was brought up, various options were discussed, a > decision > > > was taken, and here we are=2E > > > > Did that discussion happen entirely within that bug thread? >=20 > I do not remember seeing any message on emacs-devel about this topic > before Ergus started this thread=2E FTR, that bug report was a feature request (and for a new key binding at t= hat), so the fact it ended up introducing a new key binding shouldn't surpr= ise anyone=2E It is of course OK to start here a discussion about any change that could = have unintended or adverse consequences, as Ergus did in this case=2E I se= e nothing wrong with having such discussions after the change is installed= =2E