From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Antipov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: 'struct window' cleanup #2 Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 20:49:46 +0400 Message-ID: <4FE9E82A.40803@yandex.ru> References: <4FE827B6.6020306@yandex.ru> <4FE89369.2000708@gmx.at> <4FE896A9.3090002@yandex.ru> <4FE9643C.1090201@gmx.at> <83a9zq9jhp.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1340729262 9451 80.91.229.3 (26 Jun 2012 16:47:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 16:47:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: martin rudalics , monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 26 18:47:41 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SjYvU-0002JE-Rj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 18:47:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46297 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SjYvU-0000h4-Tm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 12:47:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:39716) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SjYvR-0000cq-Ll for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 12:47:38 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SjYvN-0003NZ-1T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 12:47:37 -0400 Original-Received: from forward9.mail.yandex.net ([77.88.61.48]:57051) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SjYvF-0003KH-Ry; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 12:47:26 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp6.mail.yandex.net (smtp6.mail.yandex.net [77.88.61.56]) by forward9.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id CA1FCCE0ECF; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 20:47:22 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1340729242; bh=IzMI/qooRA5GSPhAnsUjxsv/jkrPVPGO0w2QervMmiU=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=dTmtDklTG3Yrnm1qbYNI/EERR4A98W7XkixFT66wJqEbkNxkV1QSb1Qpkkl/8bRTd M+OS3XiikOLbEDCjMzJNsxNw3Kwb+14L5GOOEbb/wUQAe7MK7kLD6qR/lNN2rOuT8z bMXBMMqd7ZyOstijGM6YOunzfMgK+OASIptXhLU8= Original-Received: from smtp6.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp6.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 8683816403C3; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 20:47:22 +0400 (MSK) Original-Received: from 213-148-21-55.gelicon.ru (213-148-21-55.gelicon.ru [213.148.21.55]) by smtp6.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id lM60Yahw-lM6afdHX; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 20:47:22 +0400 X-Yandex-Rcpt-Suid: eliz@gnu.org X-Yandex-Rcpt-Suid: rudalics@gmx.at X-Yandex-Rcpt-Suid: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca X-Yandex-Rcpt-Suid: emacs-devel@gnu.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1340729242; bh=IzMI/qooRA5GSPhAnsUjxsv/jkrPVPGO0w2QervMmiU=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject: References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=fwj4CW6+SqBTCk+0GZYKkEK1K9XF+JWv77OxTCb/EvDbudx1qUmWQZJ1gS1BBUps6 WJBYxzPrUdiA0ozADBPNoE3BJhb7x2ktQHzyZtKyqB61HOe6tbFzBsype5thTJUeYr aroOR8XTBXz7pJ9wvJEk8agIh6niQCh1DLGSSDg8= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1 In-Reply-To: <83a9zq9jhp.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 77.88.61.48 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:151191 Archived-At: On 06/26/2012 07:32 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > I don't object. But if we think that Lisp integers cause any > significant slowdown during GC, we could special-case them in > mark_object, because that is a no-op for integers. That would be less > work and less potential bugs. Hm... mark_object is an absolute bottleneck now, and, IMHO, handling one more special case (just one conditional branch) will make it even worse. Dmitry