From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Davis Herring Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: BEGIN_SRC..END_SRC Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 09:21:22 -0600 Organization: XCP-1 Message-ID: <4FABDCF2.8090807@lanl.gov> References: <871umzrvfw.fsf@gmail.com> <87wr4rqg6g.fsf@gmail.com> <83d36j59gv.fsf@gnu.org> <87r4uz58e3.fsf@sec.modprobe.de> <83aa1n57p4.fsf@gnu.org> <5D17181ED92C4552AE8D4404DD035CA0@us.oracle.com> <87vck8sfyv.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <85obq05aua.fsf@iznogoud.viz> <87r4uvs4ae.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87397b15u7.fsf@gnu.org> <87y5p2nhc3.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87k40lsfuv.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87k40ljtay.fsf@gmx.com> <87fwb8sdeh.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <877gwkzcsm.fsf@gmail.com> <878vh0rz75.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1336663307 12418 80.91.229.3 (10 May 2012 15:21:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 15:21:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Yann Hodique , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 10 17:21:44 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SSVBV-0000Rh-5x for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 May 2012 17:21:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59549 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SSVBU-0001V3-HD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 May 2012 11:21:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44222) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SSVBN-0001UH-BL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 May 2012 11:21:39 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SSVBI-0001GD-KI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 May 2012 11:21:32 -0400 Original-Received: from proofpoint4.lanl.gov ([204.121.3.52]:35079) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SSVBI-0001FD-AN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 May 2012 11:21:28 -0400 Original-Received: from mailrelay2.lanl.gov (mailrelay2.lanl.gov [128.165.4.103]) by proofpoint4.lanl.gov (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q4AFLNFN026456; Thu, 10 May 2012 09:21:23 -0600 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mailrelay2.lanl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4774917BB7C0; Thu, 10 May 2012 09:21:23 -0600 (MDT) X-NIE-2-Virus-Scanner: amavisd-new at mailrelay2.lanl.gov Original-Received: from [128.165.123.187] (xray-r07.lanl.gov [128.165.123.187]) by mailrelay2.lanl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2922517BB7D0; Thu, 10 May 2012 09:21:23 -0600 (MDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110717 Lanikai/3.1.11 In-Reply-To: <878vh0rz75.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.6.7580, 1.0.260, 0.0.0000 definitions=2012-05-10_05:2012-05-10, 2012-05-10, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-Received-From: 204.121.3.52 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:150421 Archived-At: > 4.1.4. Unrecognized Subtypes > > Unrecognized subtypes of "text" should be treated as subtype "plain" > as long as the MIME implementation knows how to handle the charset. > Unrecognized subtypes which also specify an unrecognized charset > should be treated as "application/octet-stream". -- RFC 2046 > > The word "should" in an RFC has a precise (and to many, surprisingly > strong) meaning: > > 3. SHOULD This word, or the adjective "RECOMMENDED", mean that there > may exist valid reasons in particular circumstances to ignore a > particular item, but the full implications must be understood and > carefully weighed before choosing a different course. -- RFC 2119 As RFC 2046 doesn't contain the "are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119." verbiage (which is not surprising, since it's older!), it doesn't seem so plain to me that the (lowercase) "should" in 2046/4.1.4 should (hah!) be interpreted so strongly. Davis -- This product is sold by volume, not by mass. If it appears too dense or too sparse, it is because mass-energy conversion has occurred during shipping.