From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Andreas_R=F6hler?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Does CEDET work? Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 07:47:18 +0200 Message-ID: <4F8FA6E6.2080601@online.de> References: <87sjg07m94.fsf@gmail.com> <87ipgw8olq.fsf@wanadoo.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1334814458 11541 80.91.229.3 (19 Apr 2012 05:47:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 05:47:38 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 19 07:47:34 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SKkDM-00027H-N4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 07:47:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49617 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SKkDM-0005XF-1S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 01:47:32 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49679) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SKkDG-0005X9-DD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 01:47:30 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SKkDC-00075Y-3Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 01:47:25 -0400 Original-Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.187]:49888) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SKkDB-00075Q-QL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 01:47:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.178.27] (brln-4dbc6c97.pool.mediaWays.net [77.188.108.151]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrbap4) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0LjbM8-1RjDXL46lk-00bZUx; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 07:47:20 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de; rv:1.9.2.28) Gecko/20120306 SUSE/3.1.20 Thunderbird/3.1.20 In-Reply-To: <87ipgw8olq.fsf@wanadoo.es> X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:zcI6Nu1fVyMOqyJ/2DiJTAl1riSeKuC3HPw4Y4mXeBA NP5jmoPHUpKZoWgD86PRhpQsPX70CHAbBDknGcxoCwyn0fpXXj Rdh4CcqAipRHWUXfv6Rw4y+w1RgKepLIQUlbw5OzMB1zENlmm6 s1ySJPurqIUNPb0S83U01WZmneAuDyYEx71y3gQA3U4xXG3xmN 8EA47eir8pz6kBJndK1FZ3AcyuY1+bHQE/l5pbQrdWnJznjgyp TGcsPsR6STK5Oq/MwjH0CF53h0AyIET/an5mNv7b+qbrkrht48 dbV89l3IrhAwZF9utHHpvLg5SFwFyb6wNdN3bC0Gzb4asQkCSX A6ono4retsW8RGwSfLk9USSTvuMqOCUsISkmVqCdR X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 212.227.126.187 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:149807 Archived-At: Am 19.04.2012 04:03, schrieb Óscar Fuentes: > Leo writes: > >> Indeed. But the question is genuine. I have been comparing two python >> editing environments: PyCharm (commercial) and Emacs. And the former got >> decent parser for everything remotely related to python: js, html, xml, >> css, sass, sql, coffeescript etc. etc not to mention python specific >> stuff. I can appreciate such an intelligent environment and the enormous >> productivity it enables. > > Mind your words. Some time ago I posted similar concerns here and > received so much flak that I wouldn't dare to repeat the experience. > > > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/python-mode/+spec/productivity