From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard H Lee Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ASCII encryption Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 17:31:35 +0100 Message-ID: <4F8C4967.8090306@gmail.com> References: <4F8AE450.9010104@gmail.com> <4F8C07DE.6040109@pobox.com> <4F8C0FC5.8080603@gmail.com> <81wr5fu5eh.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1334607837 23827 80.91.229.3 (16 Apr 2012 20:23:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 20:23:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Jambunathan K Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 16 22:23:56 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SJsSq-0005NI-EB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 22:23:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39003 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SJsSp-0005jf-QC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 16:23:55 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58266) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SJoq6-0006X0-Ko for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 12:31:43 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SJoq5-0007bX-1A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 12:31:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-bk0-f41.google.com ([209.85.214.41]:59888) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SJoq4-0007b9-KM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 12:31:40 -0400 Original-Received: by bkwq16 with SMTP id q16so4860206bkw.0 for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 09:31:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=k0I4AoW/1RXRR9SyKs+3zxVdk/1bVB34htjVPKMf9k8=; b=YpHA3pELmxVgOYhovvRlU1VX4rDphI6gJlUSTBXYbS9g/aM2gnj/8piwPoUyhnoQ2e dvB9ffsCTpdBJp83NSEFORUtoQcIid2CAgQJYg7UxgLM7rfQs/tjOUkswlv+kDgd7JE7 xFwAXOicAYghGuEyi46AbDPWu6PlovWusxM/A92Hs6TldZfwN0BT8R+oNdR+uQZiondB 9azjfihlakseZIfwCpHT2v9oL8A8k1WWeI0e6oQKk1l4OLOWyC4z9L8Uc0yxlB8Lgo2d IKfpY9sZz95hlZRXVdd3mOJIpHMrKepKHAMfnO8UUHr27xZVZiqwWJGkCSfMRTqo9jlu tGGQ== Original-Received: by 10.204.151.89 with SMTP id b25mr3595729bkw.18.1334593897851; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 09:31:37 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.187] (87-194-63-158.bethere.co.uk. [87.194.63.158]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id cy11sm32664129bkb.7.2012.04.16.09.31.36 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 16 Apr 2012 09:31:37 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120329 Thunderbird/11.0.1 In-Reply-To: <81wr5fu5eh.fsf@gmail.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 209.85.214.41 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 16:23:53 -0400 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:149702 Archived-At: On 16/04/12 15:18, Jambunathan K wrote: > If `epa-armor' is not supported it should be removed or be made in to a > defconst. Or it could be crptically renamed so that people don't > discover it accidentally. The info manual can be augmented to mention > why the author thinks using it globally is not a good idea. > > epa-armor is like the biblical forbidden fruit with hints of both > pleasure and pain. The ultimate end it achieves is to leave mere > mortals in a state of perpetual confusion on private matters. So I that (setq epa-armor t) in my emacs file is not a good idea?