* Re: table of contents and numbers
2012-04-12 10:00 ` Julian Burgos
@ 2012-04-12 14:30 ` Nick Dokos
2012-04-12 16:52 ` Jonas Hörsch
2012-04-12 16:59 ` Jonas Hörsch
2 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Nick Dokos @ 2012-04-12 14:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Julian Burgos; +Cc: Org Mode Mailing List
Julian Burgos <julian@hafro.is> wrote:
> Thanks for the answer Nick. So to get a TOC without numbers I would
> need to edit the TEX file directly, right?
>
You could do that, but you could also use John's idea below to add
\addcontentsline after each heading in the org file.
Nick
> On mið 11.apr 2012 19:00, John Hendy wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Nick Dokos<nicholas.dokos@hp.com> wrote:
> >> Julian Burgos<julian@hafro.is> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Dear list,
> >>>
> >>> My apologies for another very basic question. I'm wondering why I do
> >>> not get a table of contents when exporting the following file as pdf
> >>>
> >>> ---start org file -----------
> >>> #+TITLE: Test
> >>> #+OPTIONS: toc:t num:nil
> >>>
> >>> * Part 1
> >>> Some text
> >>>
> >>> * Part 2
> >>> Some more text
> >>> ---end org file -----------
> >>>
> >>> I do get the TOC when exporting as hmtl, though.
> >>>
> >> I believe it's because of a rather technical latex limitation: latex
> >> writes TOC entries into a .toc file, which is then read back in when the
> >> \tableofcontents macro is expanded. When you specify num:nil asking for
> >> unnumbered sections, the latex exporter produces \section* markers,
> >> instead of the standard \section markers. But when latex processes
> >> those, it does not add anything to the .toc file. If org added a
> >> \tableofcontents, you would get just the title and an empty TOC. In
> >> order to prevent that, the latex exporter requires that both toc and num
> >> be non-nil - see l.1487 ff in lisp/org-latex.el:
> >>
> >> ,----
> >> | ...
> >> | ;; table of contents
> >> | (when (and org-export-with-toc
> >> | (plist-get opt-plist :section-numbers))
> >> | (funcall org-export-latex-format-toc-function
> >> | ...))
> >> `----
> > One can work around this by manually adding sections under each headline.
> >
> > -----
> > #+options: num:nil toc:t
> >
> > #+text: \tableofcontents
> >
> > * Introduction
> > \addcontentsline{toc}{section}{Introduction}
> > -----
> >
> > Tedious for long documents, but does work.
> >
> >
> > John
> >
> >> The HTML exporter does this "by hand", so to speak, so it is not as
> >> constrained and can do the "right" thing.
> >>
> >> Nick
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
> --
> Julian Mariano Burgos, PhD
> Hafrannsóknastofnunin/Marine Research Institute
> Skúlagata 4, 121 Reykjavík, Iceland
> Sími/Telephone : +354-5752037
> Bréfsími/Telefax: +354-5752001
> Netfang/Email: julian@hafro.is
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: table of contents and numbers
2012-04-12 10:00 ` Julian Burgos
2012-04-12 14:30 ` Nick Dokos
@ 2012-04-12 16:52 ` Jonas Hörsch
2012-04-12 16:59 ` Jonas Hörsch
2 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jonas Hörsch @ 2012-04-12 16:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-orgmode
On Thu, Apr 12 2012, Julian Burgos wrote:
> Thanks for the answer Nick. So to get a TOC without numbers I would
> need to edit the TEX file directly, right?
>
Hi there,
another option might be to remove the num:nil org option and instead
tell latex not to number any sections by setting secnumdepth to 0.
so for instance
---start org file -----------
#+TITLE: Test
#+OPTIONS: toc:t
#+LATEX_HEADER: \setcounter{secnumdepth}{0}
* Part 1
Some text
* Part 2
Some more text
---end org file -----------
should do the trick.
the only drawback is that one still needs the num:nil option for the
other export formats.
perhaps this could become another way to implement num:nil for the latex
export in general. though i don't think it would work reliably for just a
subtree then.
Greets,
Jonas
> On mið 11.apr 2012 19:00, John Hendy wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Nick Dokos<nicholas.dokos@hp.com> wrote:
>>> Julian Burgos<julian@hafro.is> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dear list,
>>>>
>>>> My apologies for another very basic question. I'm wondering why I do
>>>> not get a table of contents when exporting the following file as pdf
>>>>
>>>> ---start org file -----------
>>>> #+TITLE: Test
>>>> #+OPTIONS: toc:t num:nil
>>>>
>>>> * Part 1
>>>> Some text
>>>>
>>>> * Part 2
>>>> Some more text
>>>> ---end org file -----------
>>>>
>>>> I do get the TOC when exporting as hmtl, though.
>>>>
>>> I believe it's because of a rather technical latex limitation: latex
>>> writes TOC entries into a .toc file, which is then read back in when the
>>> \tableofcontents macro is expanded. When you specify num:nil asking for
>>> unnumbered sections, the latex exporter produces \section* markers,
>>> instead of the standard \section markers. But when latex processes
>>> those, it does not add anything to the .toc file. If org added a
>>> \tableofcontents, you would get just the title and an empty TOC. In
>>> order to prevent that, the latex exporter requires that both toc and num
>>> be non-nil - see l.1487 ff in lisp/org-latex.el:
>>>
>>> ,----
>>> | ...
>>> | ;; table of contents
>>> | (when (and org-export-with-toc
>>> | (plist-get opt-plist :section-numbers))
>>> | (funcall org-export-latex-format-toc-function
>>> | ...))
>>> `----
>> One can work around this by manually adding sections under each headline.
>>
>> -----
>> #+options: num:nil toc:t
>>
>> #+text: \tableofcontents
>>
>> * Introduction
>> \addcontentsline{toc}{section}{Introduction}
>> -----
>>
>> Tedious for long documents, but does work.
>>
>>
>> John
>>
>>> The HTML exporter does this "by hand", so to speak, so it is not as
>>> constrained and can do the "right" thing.
>>>
>>> Nick
>>>
>>>
>>>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: table of contents and numbers
2012-04-12 10:00 ` Julian Burgos
2012-04-12 14:30 ` Nick Dokos
2012-04-12 16:52 ` Jonas Hörsch
@ 2012-04-12 16:59 ` Jonas Hörsch
2 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jonas Hörsch @ 2012-04-12 16:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Julian Burgos; +Cc: Org Mode Mailing List
On Thu, Apr 12 2012, Julian Burgos wrote:
> Thanks for the answer Nick. So to get a TOC without numbers I would
> need to edit the TEX file directly, right?
>
Hi there,
another option might be to remove the num:nil org option and instead
tell latex not to number any sections by setting secnumdepth to 0.
so for instance
---start org file -----------
#+TITLE: Test
#+OPTIONS: toc:t
#+LATEX_HEADER: \setcounter{secnumdepth}{0}
* Part 1
Some text
* Part 2
Some more text
---end org file -----------
should do the trick.
the only drawback is that one still needs the num:nil option for the
other export formats.
perhaps this could become another way to implement num:nil for the latex
export in general. though i don't think it would work reliably for just a
subtree then.
Greets,
Jonas
P.S.: sorry to those fellow newsgroup-reading people, who now got this
answer twice, but i just realized, this is originally a mailing list.
> On mið 11.apr 2012 19:00, John Hendy wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Nick Dokos<nicholas.dokos@hp.com> wrote:
>>> Julian Burgos<julian@hafro.is> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dear list,
>>>>
>>>> My apologies for another very basic question. I'm wondering why I do
>>>> not get a table of contents when exporting the following file as pdf
>>>>
>>>> ---start org file -----------
>>>> #+TITLE: Test
>>>> #+OPTIONS: toc:t num:nil
>>>>
>>>> * Part 1
>>>> Some text
>>>>
>>>> * Part 2
>>>> Some more text
>>>> ---end org file -----------
>>>>
>>>> I do get the TOC when exporting as hmtl, though.
>>>>
>>> I believe it's because of a rather technical latex limitation: latex
>>> writes TOC entries into a .toc file, which is then read back in when the
>>> \tableofcontents macro is expanded. When you specify num:nil asking for
>>> unnumbered sections, the latex exporter produces \section* markers,
>>> instead of the standard \section markers. But when latex processes
>>> those, it does not add anything to the .toc file. If org added a
>>> \tableofcontents, you would get just the title and an empty TOC. In
>>> order to prevent that, the latex exporter requires that both toc and num
>>> be non-nil - see l.1487 ff in lisp/org-latex.el:
>>>
>>> ,----
>>> | ...
>>> | ;; table of contents
>>> | (when (and org-export-with-toc
>>> | (plist-get opt-plist :section-numbers))
>>> | (funcall org-export-latex-format-toc-function
>>> | ...))
>>> `----
>> One can work around this by manually adding sections under each headline.
>>
>> -----
>> #+options: num:nil toc:t
>>
>> #+text: \tableofcontents
>>
>> * Introduction
>> \addcontentsline{toc}{section}{Introduction}
>> -----
>>
>> Tedious for long documents, but does work.
>>
>>
>> John
>>
>>> The HTML exporter does this "by hand", so to speak, so it is not as
>>> constrained and can do the "right" thing.
>>>
>>> Nick
>>>
>>>
>>>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread