From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Moritz Maxeiner Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: DocView AutoFitting via "doc-view-autofit-mode" Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 15:38:37 +0200 Message-ID: <4F7AFD5D.3030809@googlemail.com> References: <4F764EBB.5030102@googlemail.com> <87sjgnbxth.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <4F79E8D5.8080701@googlemail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1333460835 31932 80.91.229.3 (3 Apr 2012 13:47:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 13:47:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Tassilo Horn , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 03 15:47:12 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SF44m-0008Fh-33 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Apr 2012 15:47:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33104 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SF3wo-0007Uq-KS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Apr 2012 09:38:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44035) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SF3wl-0007U0-3p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Apr 2012 09:38:56 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SF3wb-0003C5-8d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Apr 2012 09:38:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-bk0-f41.google.com ([209.85.214.41]:48238) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SF3wa-0003Bi-VX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Apr 2012 09:38:45 -0400 Original-Received: by bkwq16 with SMTP id q16so4012349bkw.0 for ; Tue, 03 Apr 2012 06:38:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=m0wl6ikSTPpWrTE6De4tiAUSux/rdvMddoiuTjWkgJc=; b=IaY3Hp5eCLyXj4EKcecOC8QvWooife30FjQIjQQr78KRilgvFXMoaiGIT0cUMZmnng wO5nJsTsQNs7J/VPHpFfj04YkD6u3zsC9E/SGejewJMvq3Bu2yjelC8wt6XiNdeZ+/Se +AN0GWlC1VVhaxQMu//ZVLLIoGLwGVu/jO7uUpUw3Ukbg8I5sDTMalsqhwI6lkt9gHqP ulc53OifEkc1UtvW1q1hXxv7uyfUGGjvzeWOncHV7JpF7W4A7cHEdUFTRpRu9p046Ty/ 79yj4x48vOGlSrb3uf4t9WjUUCOES+LjOn0/r1SXSOG7F3YWzoDcLyNggQ93odzMmZ1z GGdg== Original-Received: by 10.204.156.65 with SMTP id v1mr5408919bkw.109.1333460322631; Tue, 03 Apr 2012 06:38:42 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.2.118] (p4FC979AA.dip.t-dialin.net. [79.201.121.170]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s16sm46050034bkt.3.2012.04.03.06.38.41 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 03 Apr 2012 06:38:41 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 209.85.214.41 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:149326 Archived-At: Am 4/3/2012 15:34, schrieb Stefan Monnier: >> It is already enabled (bzr trunk), I just didn't see it. Strangely >> enough, using `lexical-let' inside a lexical binding enabled file >> produces tons of "bad lexing" errors when used with named functions >> (It doesn't in lexica-binding disabled files). > I don't know what "used with named functions" mean. > > > Stefan In the context of what was talked about (lambda () (message "foo")) would be an unnamed function, whereas (defun foo () (message "foo")) would be a function named "foo"