From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10805: 24.0.93; edebug-trace t may cause stuff being inserted into current buffer Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 10:58:45 +0100 Message-ID: <4F3E24D5.7090003@gmx.at> References: <87y5s6l63w.fsf@web.de> <4F3A3D3C.8020002@gmx.at> <87vcn97z07.fsf@web.de> <4F3B814D.3060607@gmx.at> <878vk2kxsf.fsf@web.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1329472768 16026 80.91.229.3 (17 Feb 2012 09:59:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 09:59:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10805@debbugs.gnu.org To: michael_heerdegen@web.de Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 17 10:59:27 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RyKb5-0003Z5-Go for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 10:59:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55750 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RyKb5-0007s6-7k for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 04:59:23 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:42962) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RyKay-0007rr-Pg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 04:59:20 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RyKat-000665-0n for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 04:59:16 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:39725) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RyKas-000661-UU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 04:59:10 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RyKcg-00062B-84 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 05:01:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 10:01:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10805 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10805-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10805.132947285023176 (code B ref 10805); Fri, 17 Feb 2012 10:01:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10805) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Feb 2012 10:00:50 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43348 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RyKcU-00061k-4G for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 05:00:50 -0500 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]:34635) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RyKcO-00061L-Ui for 10805@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 05:00:46 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 17 Feb 2012 09:58:46 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-62-21.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.62.21]) [62.47.62.21] by mail.gmx.net (mp020) with SMTP; 17 Feb 2012 10:58:46 +0100 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19/tTcDLVt/Tbc1vLT/0CyXbdr+/2dfBUij/SlOB8 jYtMdyWVDvrC9K In-Reply-To: <878vk2kxsf.fsf@web.de> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:56961 Archived-At: > Yes, of course, that works. The same applies to the source code > buffers. Maybe we could introduce a user option specifying if windows > in other (visible) frames should be considered or not. Dunno if that > would be appropriate, I didn't use edebug much before. Currently, > edebug never considers other frames (most of the code seems to have been > written at a time when Emacs did not yet have frames). Some users might > find it handy if they could use source buffers spread over several > frames, and edebug would work with them. Adding an appropriate rule for these buffers to `display-buffer-alist' should be the appropriate solution. The problem is that it's non-trivial to identify source code buffers in `display-buffer-alist'. For example, in the case that the user wants to make buffer display via edebug behave differently from via `find-file'. martin