From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9723: 24.0.50; Emacs Clipboard crash Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 12:08:34 +0100 Message-ID: <4F2A6EB2.4090708@gmx.at> References: <83lis391w3.fsf@gnu.org> <81B49A9E5708D84A96259A96D480EE4902D815F95A@CHC-CCR01.SEA.CORP.EXPECN.COM> <83wr8l2y6r.fsf@gnu.org> <81B49A9E5708D84A96259A96D480EE4902D815FA2B@CHC-CCR01.SEA.CORP.EXPECN.COM> <83mx9h2em4.fsf@gnu.org> <81B49A9E5708D84A96259A96D480EE4902D81606FB@CHC-CCR01.SEA.CORP.EXPECN.COM> <81B49A9E5708D84A96259A96D480EE4902E2FD8799@CHC-CCR01.SEA.CORP.EXPECN.COM> <83obtlqabj.fsf@gnu.org> <81B49A9E5708D84A96259A96D480EE4902E2FD8919@CHC-CCR01.SEA.CORP.EXPECN.COM> <83k448riyw.fsf@gnu.org> <81B49A9E5708D84A96259A96D480EE4902E2FD8BCA@CHC-CCR01.SEA.CORP.EXPECN.COM> <8362frrcmz.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1328181061 29527 80.91.229.3 (2 Feb 2012 11:11:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 11:11:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Joseph Jones , 9723@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 02 12:10:56 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RsuZ5-00052a-5a for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2012 12:10:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47964 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsuZ4-0007Ay-0i for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2012 06:10:54 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:33249) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsuYv-00076s-KH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2012 06:10:51 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsuYm-0007WE-KF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2012 06:10:45 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:46412) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsuYm-0007W4-En for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2012 06:10:36 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsuZC-0000Yg-Jf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2012 06:11:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 11:11:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9723 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9723-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9723.13281810252088 (code B ref 9723); Thu, 02 Feb 2012 11:11:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9723) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Feb 2012 11:10:25 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50032 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsuYa-0000Xd-Q1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2012 06:10:25 -0500 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.23]:44830) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsuYY-0000XN-3J for 9723@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2012 06:10:23 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 02 Feb 2012 11:09:46 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-50-194.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.50.194]) [62.47.50.194] by mail.gmx.net (mp019) with SMTP; 02 Feb 2012 12:09:46 +0100 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+W5dQjoTaW+QoS8oLEQg7gv/AE46xagLNcLPa+61 ll+m2XtbZhL3VV In-Reply-To: <8362frrcmz.fsf@gnu.org> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:56378 Archived-At: > According to this, Emacs decided to apply a change in window > dimensions that was pending from some previous redisplay cycle. So > far so good, but look at the new size of the window it tries to set: > its newwidth value is -2, a negative number. This should never > happen. (The value -2 is "upgraded" to +2, the minimum "safe" value, > inside change_frame_size, but 2 is also too small.) The upgrading happens in check_frame_size and 2 is the minimum width sufficient for the frame's root window. Why do you think it's too small? > The question is now which code requested the change of window width to > -2, and why. If you know what the minimum "safe" value is, why not use that? martin