From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Paul Eggert Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Should configure fail if pkg-config fails? Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 14:26:33 -0800 Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department Message-ID: <4F1F3019.8060808@cs.ucla.edu> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1327444019 26877 80.91.229.12 (24 Jan 2012 22:26:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 22:26:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs development discussions To: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9yZGkgR3V0acOpcnJleiBIZXJtb3Nv?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 24 23:26:55 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RpopL-00027Z-43 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 23:26:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35079 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RpopK-0003Hm-Ed for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 17:26:54 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:45520) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RpopD-0003HZ-HL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 17:26:52 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RpopA-0006lt-8X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 17:26:47 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.62]:50799) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rpop9-0006lC-Vk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 17:26:44 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FDC4A60018; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 14:26:34 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smtp.cs.ucla.edu Original-Received: from smtp.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gVmGB82wIKp4; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 14:26:34 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from penguin.cs.ucla.edu (Penguin.CS.UCLA.EDU [131.179.64.200]) by smtp.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5DF9BA60014; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 14:26:34 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0 In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 131.179.128.62 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:147892 Archived-At: On 01/24/2012 01:58 PM, Jordi Guti=C3=A9rrez Hermoso wrote: > Shouldn't the configure script emit a clear warning if pkg-config fails= ? Could be. What exactly was the failure?