From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Antipov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Some obsolete/unused/garbage things around window code? Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 15:00:45 +0400 Message-ID: <4F0C1A5D.7000205@yandex.ru> References: <4F0BDAD8.6030201@yandex.ru> <4F0C10D4.2000908@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1326193272 11839 80.91.229.12 (10 Jan 2012 11:01:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 11:01:12 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 10 12:01:08 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RkZRz-0005CX-Uz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 12:01:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40489 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RkZRz-0001jI-6s for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 06:01:07 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:45411) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RkZQw-0008AI-9O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 06:00:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RkZQr-0001kx-R0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 06:00:02 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.dev.rtsoft.ru ([213.79.90.226]:60219) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RkZQr-0001kN-26 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 05:59:57 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 29563 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2012 10:59:54 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.5.146?) (192.168.1.70) by 0 with SMTP; 10 Jan 2012 10:59:54 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1 In-Reply-To: <4F0C10D4.2000908@gmx.at> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-Received-From: 213.79.90.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:147560 Archived-At: On 01/10/2012 02:20 PM, martin rudalics wrote: > > 2) What's an idea behind sequence_number of window objects? It's > > initialized > > within make_window and make_parent_window, but used only in printing > > code. > > How else would we identify windows in printed notation? BTW I plan to > make sequence numbers available in Elisp for 24.2. For frames, C pointer value of 'struct frame' is used, i.e.: ... sprintf (buf, " %p", XFRAME (obj)); ... Why it should be done in a different way for windows? Dmitry