From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Some obsolete/unused/garbage things around window code? Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 11:20:04 +0100 Message-ID: <4F0C10D4.2000908@gmx.at> References: <4F0BDAD8.6030201@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1326190826 26856 80.91.229.12 (10 Jan 2012 10:20:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 10:20:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Antipov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 10 11:20:22 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RkYoY-0000cG-8A for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 11:20:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53666 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RkYoX-0002Ic-LN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 05:20:21 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:51994) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RkYoR-0002Dh-Ml for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 05:20:19 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RkYoL-0003lN-Ep for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 05:20:15 -0500 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]:50391) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RkYoL-0003kf-0W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 05:20:09 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 10 Jan 2012 10:20:07 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-50-238.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.50.238]) [62.47.50.238] by mail.gmx.net (mp034) with SMTP; 10 Jan 2012 11:20:07 +0100 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/k++8o4vPkH4xDG5hcR0GrgwgEmvp6VCnFljGCU9 UE6xvbi3bIrddi In-Reply-To: <4F0BDAD8.6030201@yandex.ru> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 213.165.64.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:147557 Archived-At: > 1) last_mark_x and last_mark_y fields of 'struct window' aren't used > anywhere > except initialization in make_window - is it reasonable to drop them > at all? Yes. > 2) What's an idea behind sequence_number of window objects? It's > initialized > within make_window and make_parent_window, but used only in printing > code. How else would we identify windows in printed notation? BTW I plan to make sequence numbers available in Elisp for 24.2. martin