From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Daniel Colascione Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Can we depend on FD_CLOEXEC always being supported? Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2012 14:46:30 -0800 Message-ID: <4F0A1CC6.5020208@dancol.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig139B62E82F7F4DE61D2A5D4E" X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1326062812 12460 80.91.229.12 (8 Jan 2012 22:46:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2012 22:46:52 +0000 (UTC) To: Emacs development discussions Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 08 23:46:48 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Rk1Vo-00018R-7D for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 08 Jan 2012 23:46:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47430 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rk1Vn-0003cp-9a for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 08 Jan 2012 17:46:47 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:58978) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rk1Vj-0003ck-OK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Jan 2012 17:46:46 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rk1Vi-0003Bn-Jn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Jan 2012 17:46:43 -0500 Original-Received: from dancol.org ([96.126.100.184]:59860) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rk1Vi-0003BY-Ev for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Jan 2012 17:46:42 -0500 Original-Received: from c-24-18-179-193.hsd1.wa.comcast.net ([24.18.179.193] helo=edith.local) by dancol.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rk1Va-0002HQ-LH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Jan 2012 14:46:34 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.4 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 96.126.100.184 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:147491 Archived-At: This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig139B62E82F7F4DE61D2A5D4E Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Aside from DOS_NT, do we support any platforms without FD_CLOEXEC? Today, it's only used conditionally in the Emacs code. I don't see why: FD_CLOEXEC has been standard for a very long time (4.3BSD and SVr4). Why wouldn't we want to use it unconditionally? --------------enig139B62E82F7F4DE61D2A5D4E Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iEYEARECAAYFAk8KHMkACgkQ17c2LVA10VsKSQCfXmdvjjW/FxHJI1XEY9Ni4s/y yIYAmweLcaQQvsGuUmTQ1rUF25nX+F3s =pIgZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig139B62E82F7F4DE61D2A5D4E--