On 12/29/11 2:21 PM, Dan Nicolaescu wrote:
> We don't use something like "#include TERM_HEADER" in any other place,
> it you really want to consolidate this stuff, creating a new header
> file to include seems better.

There's a first time for everything, and besides: other projects have
successfully used this approach. My initial revisions actually did
exactly what you suggest, but I realized that the solution was more
complex and didn't actually have any benefit.

Besides, we have src/s/*.h and src/m/*.h. At least this approach is
explicit.

> Also "TERM" does not look like a good prefix
> in this case, it's meaning might be confused with the TERM environment
> variable (nsterm/w32term/xterm are not that great either, but better not
> propagate the confusion).

"Term", I think, it pretty clear in the context of Emacs. Using a
different name for the header constant wouldn't change the names of all
the datatypes in that header. It's better to at least be consistently
confusing.

There's XTERM_HEADER, but this name has other issues.